Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll said he “talked to an astronaut yesterday who’s on the moon who’s a soldier,” sparking confusion and conspiracy theories amid no public lunar missions since 1972.
At a Glance
- Dan Driscoll made the claim during a Fox News appearance on June 12, 2025
- No human has landed on the moon since Apollo 17 in December 1972
- Social media erupted, with some suggesting a secret Moon base or miscommunication
- Observers propose Driscoll may have misreferenced an astronaut aboard the ISS
- Driscoll spoke during a segment discussing Army recruitment and outreach efforts
Moon or Mix‑Up?
Speaking on Fox News on June 12, Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll stated, “We talked to an astronaut yesterday who’s on the moon who’s a soldier.” That claim immediately clashed with the historical record, as the last lunar mission was Apollo 17 in December 1972, with no U.S. astronauts landing on the Moon since.
A viral clip of the statement sparked debate. Some pundits floated speculative theories of clandestine Moon operations or secret lunar bases. However, many interpreters pointed out Driscoll could have been referring to Colonel Anne McClain, a U.S. Army astronaut currently aboard the International Space Station, not the Moon.
Social Media Reacts
The alleged comment lit up platforms overnight. Reddit’s r/LessCredibleDefence weighed in with pointed perspectives, questioning whether the statement revealed classified operations or simply a miscommunication.
Meanwhile, X users speculated about secret Space Force operations or undisclosed Moon bases. The comment even inspired memes suggesting that a lunar military presence had somehow escaped global scrutiny.
Why The Comment Matters
Driscoll’s remark came amid broader Army efforts to highlight capabilities ranging from disaster response to space involvement. These initiatives include new recruitment drives, showcasing military technology, and participation in public events. Notably, the Army is preparing for a high-profile parade in Washington, D.C., where such narratives could influence public perception.
Watch a report: Army Secretary’s Moon Video Segment Sparks Debate.
What Comes Next
Clarification from official channels is now anticipated. Observers are waiting to see whether Driscoll meant an ISS astronaut or whether another explanation will emerge. Public confusion continues to mount, but no credible evidence has surfaced to support the idea of an active military operation on the Moon. For now, the weight of the evidence leans toward a verbal slip rather than a lunar bombshell.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Editor
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://deepstatetribunal.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
