President Trump dropped a bombshell on The Post’s “Pod Force One” podcast, alleging Biden aides exploited a White House autopen to sign orders behind the president’s back. The claim, aired Monday, paints a picture of a presidency hijacked by unelected staffers. It’s a serious charge that demands scrutiny.
Trump told host Miranda Devine that Biden aides used the autopen to enact 162 executive actions and 4,245 clemency grants without Biden’s full awareness, taking advantage of his cognitive decline. The Justice Department and House Republicans are now investigating these allegations, probing potential misuse of authority and a cover-up of Biden’s mental state. The autopen, a device for signing documents, has been a White House tool since Truman’s era.
When Biden took office on Jan. 20, 2021, he issued orders ending Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” policy, reviving Obama’s DACA program, and stopping the U.S.-Mexico border wall. Trump insists these moves, among others, were driven by “radical left lunatics” who saw Biden’s weakness as their chance to rule. “They could do anything they wanted, because the autopen was the power,” Trump said.
Autopen Signatures Raise Eyebrows
Trump’s accusation hinges on the autopen’s role in Biden’s presidency. An Oversight Project analysis found nearly all of Biden’s official signatures, except his 2024 campaign withdrawal, bore the autopen’s uniform mark. That’s a red flag when a president’s pen is supposed to reflect personal judgment.
Biden’s pardon for his son Hunter, issued Dec. 1, 2024, stands out with a slanted, lighter signature—likely handwritten. It cleared Hunter of a firearm felony and tax evasion charges spanning 2014 to 2024. But other family pardons on Jan. 19, 2025, for James, Sara, Frank, and Valerie Biden Owens showed bolder, identical signatures, hinting at autopen use.
“You see, it’s the same,” Trump said, noting the autopen’s telltale consistency. He argues aides abused this tool to push through 1,500 sentence commutations on Dec. 12, 2024, and even clemency for 37 federal death row inmates. Actions have consequences, and these signatures raise questions about who was really in charge.
Investigations Target White House Aides
The Justice Department, under pardon attorney Ed Martin, launched a probe last week to determine if Biden was competent to authorize these orders. A June 4, 2025, memo from Trump to Attorney General Pam Bondi accused aides of hiding Biden’s decline to wield Article II powers. That’s not just a power grab—it’s a betrayal of public trust.
House Republicans, led by Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, are also digging into claims of a White House cover-up. They’re asking whether aides deliberately obscured Biden’s mental state to keep the autopen humming. The stakes are high when unelected staffers might be steering the ship.
White House sources admit at least one aide is suspected of overstepping authority with the autopen. “They surrounded the beautiful Resolute Desk,” Trump said, evoking a scene of aides orchestrating a quiet coup. It’s a vivid image, but the truth lies in the evidence.
Biden Defends His Decisions
Biden pushed back, insisting he approved all pardons, orders, and proclamations. “Any suggestion that I didn’t is ridiculous and false,” he stated after the investigation began. Yet, the uniform signatures and Trump’s allegations cast doubt on his claim.
Trump’s own White House, per a Jan. 28, 2025, memo, restricts autopen use to two aides—Will Scharf and Susie Wiles. This move signals a commitment to transparency, contrasting with the Biden team’s alleged free-for-all. Governance should never be on autopilot.
“They are criminals, and what they did to our country should never be forgotten,” Trump declared. His words resonate with those who value accountability, but they also risk inflaming tensions. The investigations must sort fact from rhetoric.
A Presidency Under Scrutiny
The autopen controversy isn’t just about signatures—it’s about who holds power. Trump’s claim that aides exploited Biden’s condition to enact their agenda challenges the integrity of democratic leadership. If true, it’s a scandal that demands justice.
For conservatives, this saga underscores the dangers of unchecked bureaucracy. “They didn’t want [Biden]. They wanted Bernie Sanders,” Trump quipped, suggesting a progressive hijacking of the White House. It’s a witty jab, but the real issue is accountability, not ideology.
As investigations unfold, the nation watches closely. The autopen, once a clerical tool, now symbolizes a deeper question: Who was running the show? The answer will shape how we view Biden’s legacy—and trust in government itself.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Benjamin Clark
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://americandigest.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
