You might wonder why I haven’t written much lately about Berenson v Biden,
—
Now, almost two months later, we still await answers to these questions.
Maybe Judge Clarke has looked at the strength of our facts and legal arguments and decided we have presented at least enough to reach the next stage of the case, where we can subpoena the defendants. Maybe she has decided untangling the private and federal defendants is impossible for now. Maybe she’s about to drop a ruling this afternoon, or tomorrow, or next week.
Until she rules, there’s just no way to know.
—
(While you wait…)
—
Meanwhile, with the stay in place, we’re waiting to hear more from the government on its plans. It may be a while. You may have heard the Trump administration has a few other legal battles to worry about.
Still, part of me worries that Pfizer is trying to interfere to protect its interests, a move that be particularly ironic given the evidence I’ve just unearthed about how Pfizer may have cost Donald Trump millions of votes in 2020.
—
—
And so we wait. I remain optimistic — James Lawrence and I prevailed against Twitter despite incredibly long odds. I believe we can do so again.
Meanwhile, as we wait, if you want to help refresh the war chest — either for depositions and the next phase of the case if Judge Clarke rules in our favor, or for an appeal if she doesn’t — you can do so here:
Or Venmo: Alex-Berenson-3 – last four digits of my phone are 1745.
Or send a check to Envisage Law, PO Box 30099, Raleigh, NC 27622
I am grateful more than you know all donations, from the smallest to the largest. Many hands make light work.
Keep your fingers crossed and hope Judge Clarke sees the truth.
Alex
The reasons for this are complex and relate specifically to Slavitt’s close relationship with the White House through the summer of 2021. But the law is clear: in some circumstances, private citizens can be viewed as “state actors.”
In addition, as a matter of law, the “core” First Amendment and 1985(3) conspiracy claims would seem to be inextricably linked (because the conspiracy claim arises from violations of my First Amendment rights).
