In a stunning display of partisan gridlock, the House of Representatives passed a GOP-backed resolution condemning a tragic terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, while supporting federal immigration enforcement, despite fierce opposition from over half of House Democrats.
The Daily Caller reported that the vote, which ended 280 to 113 in favor of the resolution, exposed a sharp divide on combating antisemitism and securing the nation’s borders through Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) efforts.
Earlier this week, on Monday evening, the House unanimously passed a separate resolution focused solely on denouncing antisemitism and violence against Jewish individuals, with no lawmakers opposing it.
That unity vanished when the broader resolution, introduced by freshman Republican Rep. Gabe Evans of Colorado, hit the floor with added language on immigration enforcement. It’s almost as if consensus is allergic to complexity these days.
Partisan Split on Immigration and Antisemitism
The latest resolution not only condemned the Boulder attack but also expressed appreciation for ICE personnel in “protecting the homeland” and urged the incoming Trump administration to rigorously vet foreign nationals seeking visas. Of the voting Democrats, 113 stood against it, while 75 crossed the aisle to join Republicans in support.
Six lawmakers, including Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, opted for a “present” vote, making her the only GOP member not to fully back the measure.
One wonders if “present” is just a polite way of saying “I’d rather not touch this hot potato.”
The resolution’s sponsor, Rep. Gabe Evans, a former law enforcement officer and Iraq War veteran, drew praise from House Majority Leader Steve Scalise for his background and resolve.
Scalise didn’t hold back, stating, “Only radical Democrats would call it a joke to denounce antisemitic terrorism and express gratitude to law enforcement.” Ouch—turns out dismissing a serious resolution can backfire with a sharp rhetorical jab.
At the heart of the debate is the Boulder terrorist attack, allegedly carried out by Mohamed Soliman, a suspect who overstayed a visa that expired in February 2023 and was in the United States without authorization at the time of the incident.
This detail fueled Republican arguments for stronger border security measures. It’s hard to ignore the glaring question: How many wake-up calls do we need?
House Majority Whip Tom Emmer doubled down, pointing fingers at Democratic leadership for failing to secure the border during the Biden administration, suggesting this negligence contributed to the attack. While the accusation stings, it’s a reminder that policy gaps can have real, tragic consequences.
Yet, not everyone sees Evans as a champion of principle. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries scoffed, asking, “Who is this guy?” when referring to the Colorado representative.
Democratic Criticism of Rep. Evans
Jeffries didn’t stop there, accusing Evans of lacking genuine concern for combating antisemitism in America. He added, “He’s not seriously concerned with combating antisemitism in America.”
Jeffries went even further, predicting a short tenure for the freshman lawmaker with, “This guy’s going to be a one-term member of Congress.” While the personal jab may rally some bases, it sidesteps the substance of a resolution addressing both hate and security, perhaps a missed opportunity for dialogue.
Jeffries concluded his critique by calling Evans “a complete and total embarrassment” and “a joke” on his way out of Congress. Harsh words, but when the focus shifts from policy to personality, it’s the American people who lose the most in the noise.
On the other side, NRCC spokesperson Mike Marinella fired back at the Democratic dissenters, claiming, “House Democrats just sided with terrorists over cops.”
While the statement packs a punch, it’s a stark framing of a vote that likely hinged on complex disagreements over immigration policy rather than outright malice. Still, the optics aren’t exactly flattering for those who voted no.
The resolution’s passage, despite significant opposition, underscores a persistent rift in how lawmakers approach the dual challenges of antisemitism and border security. With 280 votes in favor, including a notable chunk of Democrats, there’s at least a sliver of bipartisan recognition that these issues demand attention.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Sophia Turner
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://patriotmomdigest.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
