Support James’s scholarship. Dr. Avery Brinkley Jr. shared this with me.
‘The Founding Vision: From 9/11 to Normalization
Founded in 2003 by Peter Thiel, Alex Karp, Stephen Cohen, and others, Palantir’s initial mission was straightforward: use data to prevent terrorism. With early funding from In-Q-Tel, the venture arm of the CIA, and Thiel’s own capital, the company focused on building software that could help intelligence agencies connect the dots before the next 9/11. The result was Gotham—a powerful data integration and analysis platform now widely used by U.S. intelligence and law enforcement.
Subscribe
But Palantir didn’t stop there. As the years went on, it expanded into commercial, healthcare, and civilian infrastructure domains, offering another platform, Foundry, for enterprise clients. The logic was simple: crises don’t just happen on battlefields. They happen in hospitals, boardrooms, and supply chains. And Palantir would be there to “solve” them.
The Core Tools of Influence
Palantir now markets four core platforms. Gotham is used by law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and the military to manage surveillance, counterinsurgency, and homeland security operations. Foundry serves companies and government agencies alike, managing logistics, analytics, and supply chain data for clients ranging from Merck and Airbus to the NHS and HHS. Apollo provides continuous delivery and deployment infrastructure, while AIP (Artificial Intelligence Platform) integrates large language models into secure environments to automate querying, simulation, and even policy generation.
Palantir is not just a software vendor. It is aiming to become an operating system for governments.
The Federal Advisory Board Strategy: Who They Just Hired
In 2022, Palantir announced the appointment of three new members to its Federal Advisory Board: Dr. Deborah Birx, former Coronavirus Response Coordinator; Will Hurd, former CIA officer and U.S. Congressman; and General Gustave Perna, who oversaw the military logistics for Operation Warp Speed.
Each of these individuals played a highly visible role in the centralization of authority during the COVID-19 pandemic and in the subsequent erosion of public trust. Dr. Birx, in particular, became infamous for her expansive interpretation of death certificate coding. In a widely reported and quietly catastrophic decision, she gave public health departments the green light to count all deaths with COVID as deaths from COVID. This singular semantic shift had enormous downstream effects: it inflated case fatality statistics, contributed to prolonged lockdown policies, and distorted the risk-benefit perception of every public health intervention that followed. Birx later admitted in interviews that she knew the data were being presented in ways that would influence political behavior, and she defended her actions as necessary to achieve compliance. For the Popular Rationalism community, which values epistemic integrity over paternalistic narrative control, such reasoning is not just flawed—it is disqualifying.
Will Hurd’s background in the CIA and his consistent alignment with surveillance-state policy further reveals Palantir’s intentions. A staunch advocate for cybersecurity expansion and public-private intelligence cooperation, Hurd represents the seamless blend of Silicon Valley and Langley. As a legislator, he pushed for deeper integration of corporate platforms into national security architecture. In this context, his presence on Palantir’s advisory board is not advisory at all—it is strategic entrenchment.
General Perna, meanwhile, brings the military logistics apparatus to bear. He was tasked with overseeing Operation Warp Speed’s vaccine rollout, a program that delivered mRNA injections at an unprecedented pace, often under opaque safety and distribution protocols. His role symbolizes the militarization of public health and the normalization of top-down, centrally coordinated responses in domains where nuance, diversity of opinion, and consent should be paramount.
Together, these appointments reveal Palantir’s endgame: to become an indispensable actor in every emergency response protocol, crisis dashboard, and automated policy engine. These are not apolitical experts. They are system-fixers for a system designed to ignore dissent and centralize control.
Red Flags for the Reality-Based, Open Society and Freedom-Based Community
For those who believe that evidence should lead policy, not the reverse, Palantir’s entrenchment is troubling. The company’s algorithms are opaque, often producing insights that are accepted uncritically by government clients unfamiliar with the system’s logic. Surveillance operations carried out with Palantir tools have been tied to ethically dubious practices, including predictive policing and aggressive deportation programs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Palantir’s construction of the HHS Protect platform sidelined the CDC, creating a data funnel controlled by contractors with no formal public health accountability. There are no mandatory civilian audits or transparency requirements for agencies relying on Palantir, making this a case of governance by black box.
Projected Applications No One Should Want
If Palantir continues on its current trajectory, we may soon see real-time social credit systems that fuse health records, financial data, and GPS tracking to assign behavioral risk scores. Algorithmic parole systems could automate decisions about who stays incarcerated, based on probabilistic models that lack human context. Emergency declarations might be triggered not by public deliberation, but by AI-driven simulations. Mental health interventions could become preemptive, targeting individuals based on biometric trends or online behavior. Automated censorship pipelines might arise from “disinformation detection” tools embedded in civic infrastructure. All of these are not only possible within Palantir’s infrastructure—they are plausible given current trends.
Why Popular Rationalism Readers Should Care
Palantir is not just a data company. It is a policy engine, an epistemic filter, and a vector for centralized control disguised as efficiency. Its growth reflects a broader pattern in governance: where complex decisions are increasingly outsourced to machines, models, and black-box tools.
The rationalist community must not confuse calculability with clarity, or integration with integrity.
Palantir doesn’t want to overthrow governments. It wants to run them through “support” and suggestion. To be the invisible staffer in every meeting. The silent partner in every crisis.
Eyes on the Seeing Stone
Palantir claims it sees all. But what matters more is whether we can see it. Who audits the audit system? Who watches the watchers when the watcher is a proprietary algorithm?
It’s time we pulled back the curtain on this all-seeing stone before it becomes the oracle of our civic life.
If the future must be data-driven, let it be democratically driven too. Anything less is abdication.’
