A largely empty shelf at a Dollar Tree store in Alhambra, Calif., in April. Photo: AFP via Getty Images
By David Blond
It takes 30 to 50 days for container ships from Asia to reach the U.S.’s West Coast ports. Barring new, faster shipping options or a stunning retreat by U.S. President Donald Trump on China tariffs, the consumer retail economy, which constitutes 70% of GDP, will be damaged. Demand for container space from China on the ships transiting the Pacific Ocean currently is running 60% to 65% below what it normally would be at this time.
Attention, U.S. shoppers: If you see something you need or even think you will, head to Walmart or Target or a local retailer and buy it. Already you can see the shelves starting to empty.
Some analysts are concentrating on the higher prices on imports, but the truth is that fewer American businesses will clear products through U.S. customs. It won’t be price that matters; it will be the lack of product to sell.
Stop the trade flow, and you stop the economy.
Damage to the U.S. economy is happening in slow motion. Without products to sell in stores, retail employers (responsible for 10% of all jobs in the U.S.) will shed employees, a cascade of negatives now showing up in both statistics and “for lease” signs. Small businesses from Alaska to Maine without imported goods to use in the factory or sell at the shop will close. Bankruptcy sales will proliferate. Now consider that job losses have a multiplier effect, further reducing economic output.
The impact on the U.S. economy will soon be obvious. Economies run on flows from wages, and from federal government grants for thousands of immediate needs. Without this flow and with the layoffs and cuts to wages, the U.S. economy will continue to slow and could be in a recession by the summer. Let’s not forget the immigration raids that must be spooking farmers and their workers.
For U.S. manufacturers, building a network of new suppliers is complex due to the specific nature and qualities of the parts used in manufacturing production, even if there is an American company that might, with time and detailed drawings, make the foreign part at competitive prices, the risk to current production is too great and costly to make this feasible. If attempted then during this transition, hourly employees would be laid off and production lines stopped. Local communities, many of them in the Trump-friendliest states, would suffer.
The uncertainty of the chaotic Trump plan also clouds the American economy. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is holding interest rates steady, inviting Trump’s ire. If and when Trump manages to renegotiate a trade deal, it won’t be worth much unless it’s with America’s most valuable trading partners, including Canada, Mexico, China, South Korea and Japan, as well as the European Union. I suspect that most of the “deals” may be with countries that the U.S. barely trades with, including India.
China and the U.S. are scheduled to conduct trade talks this weekend in Geneva. But China knows that it does not need to do more than agree to meet to discuss the future of U.S.-China trade relations. Sending negotiators to Geneva costs nothing beyond airfare and hotel bills.
For China, the U.S. is not the only country that matters. China could add pain to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s day job by dumping its cache of U.S. Treasury debt on the bond market, driving the U.S. dollar lower and short-term rates higher, and further weakening the U.S. stock markets. China might also find it useful to join a coalition of countries suffering under American economic bullying and redirect trade and manufacturing capacity elsewhere in the world.
Tax cuts in jeopardy
Also in jeopardy: the path for congressional Republicans to keep their 2017 tax cuts (which are especially generous to corporations and the wealthy) from disappearing. Even though income-tax rates on lower-income workers will rise marginally, the necessary deep cuts in healthcare, food assistance and other parts of the U.S. government will likely prove too politically dangerous for Congress to pass before the tax cuts expire.
Trump, who must have slept through macroeconomics at Wharton, bases his thinking on microeconomic principles only. Before 1933, economists and politicians focused on industrial relationships and monetary policy. When President Herbert Hoover and Congress tried to balance the federal budget with deep cuts, and the Federal Reserve raised rates and slowed the flow of money, the Great Depression was fueled.
The Trump administration is channeling Hoover. The 1932 U.S. election was a disaster for the Republican Party. Republicans would be wise to let the 2017 tax cuts expire and not touch Medicare or Medicaid. This would reduce the U.S. budget deficit, and Republicans could avoid repeating Hoover’s errors.
[…]
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: stuartbramhall
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://stuartbramhall.wordpress.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.