The Supreme Court has swept aside a legal effort to stop the Biden Administration’s social media censorship schemes.
By a
The new messages also show O’Boyle and his boss, the head of Twitter’s United States public policy, viewed Gottlieb and Slavitt as speaking for the White House – and that they wanted to keep the White House happy and Twitter out of the firestorm that Facebook faced.
Within days of their approach, Twitter escalated the pressure on my account – and barely a month later, it had banned me, for a tweet it later admitted did not violate its rules.
In other words, even before being allowed to conduct discovery on Slavitt, Gottlieb, and other defendants, I have already shown specific targeting efforts from them that occurred as Twitter took action against me – and that I suffered an account bann as a result.
I will have more to say about Berenson v Biden soon. The case has been relatively quiet since last fall but is about to enter a far more active phase.
We plan to amend our complaint to include the many new facts we have discovered since our initial filing. At the same time, the rulings in Murthy v Missouri and another Supreme Court case called NRA v Vullo have created new legal issues for us and the defense to spar over.
Things are going to get interesting.
—
By the way, if you wish to support Berenson v Biden, you can do so here:
https://www.givesendgo.com/G9X98
https://www.gofundme.com/f/berenson-v-biden-and-pfizers-albert-bourla
Or Venmo: Alex-Berenson-3 – last four digits of my phone are 1745.
Or send a check to Envisage Law, 2601 Oberlin Rd #100, Raleigh, NC 27608