As expected, special counsel Jack Smith on Monday filed a lengthy rebuttal of defendant Donald Trump’s claims that his Espionage Act prosecution should disappear on grounds that federal investigators did not preserve allegedly classified documents in the exact order in which they were found in boxes at Mar-a-Lago.
The 33-page response to the former president’s evidence spoliation-focused motion to dismiss is a bit of a trip down memory lane, highlighting Trump’s shifting defense strategy and comparing those tactics to his “newly invented explanations.”
It’s also a reminder that, at root, the defendant is accused of willfully and unlawfully retaining “some of the nation’s most highly guarded secrets” in a “haphazard” way, including by keeping those documents in “cardboard boxes along with a collection of other personally chosen keepsakes of various sizes and shapes from his presidency—newspapers, thank you notes, Christmas ornaments, magazines, clothing, and photographs of himself and others.”
The defense has asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to toss out the whole case by arguing that August 2022 federal searchers of Mar-a-Lago in “bad faith” destroyed “important exculpatory evidence relating to the locations of the allegedly classified documents at issue,” “forever” ruining Trump’s chance at claiming that “he lacked knowledge and culpable criminal intent” by not keeping the discovered documents “in the same order as they were at the time the raid commenced.”
The Special Counsel’s Office has now responded that Trump’s claims are “meritless,” as there’s never been any case “at any level, at any time, from anywhere in the country, in which the disruption of the precise order of documents gathered in the execution of a search warrant provided support for a spoliation claim.”
More important than the order of the documents within the boxes is that the prosecution (and the defense by extension) knows which documents were in which boxes, Smith stated, telling Cannon that “box-to-box integrity has been preserved.”
The special counsel remarked that the dismissal argument is “absurd,” especially when viewed in light of Trump’s prior statements on Truth Social and legal strategies in challenging the case.
“For example, he suggests (for the first time) that he may wish to argue that the classified documents were buried in the boxes and hard to see, or that the placement of classified documents near dated items shows that they were placed in the box long ago and may have been forgotten,” the special counsel said. “But because the overall contents of each box have not changed, Trump can argue both of those things and has everything he needs to do so. Nothing has been lost, much less destroyed, and there has been no bad faith.”
Calling Trump’s latest motion to dismiss rife with “newly invented explanations,” Smith reminded the judge that the defendant earlier claimed he had declassified the documents, claimed that the feds tried to frame him, and further claimed to have designated them as personal records. Smith rhetorically wondered why the defense hasn’t complained about the order of the documents within the boxes until recently.
“These explanations have nothing to do with the precise order of items within his boxes,” the reply said “And this is confirmed by the fact that in the year that has passed since indictment, Trump’s counsel have not once asked to review the boxes themselves.”
In an attempt to bolster the prosecution’s case that Trump willfully retained national defense information, Smith referenced witness accounts in his back pocket about the defendant’s alleged direct involvement in packing up the boxes from the White House — and even a genius-level, “A Beautiful Mind”-esque recall of what was inside those boxes.
“Trump’s detailed familiarity with the contents of the boxes prompted some of his staff to call them the ‘Beautiful Mind’ boxes, referring to the film of the same title about genius mathematician John Nash,” the prosecution claimed.
If anything, Smith continued, Trump’s “haphazard” and disorganized storage of the documents in the boxes should work against his “absurd” evidence spoliation arguments, since the feds could hardly have been expected to know at the time of the search that the “precise ordering of materials within these boxes possessed any exculpatory value[.]”
“[T]his is not a case where reams of identically-sized documents were stacked neatly in file folders or redwelds, arrayed perfectly within a box,” the special counsel said. “To anyone other than Trump, the boxes had no apparent organization whatsoever.”
Defending the Mar-a-Lago search as lawful and respectful to Trump, Smith said the defense produced “no evidence of bad faith” and no evidence that federal agents destroyed exculpatory evidence.
Read the prosecution’s response here.
The post Jack Smith rebuts Trump’s ‘newly invented’ Mar-a-Lago explanations, says he kept some of America’s ‘most highly guarded secrets’ with photos of himself in ‘Beautiful Mind’ boxes first appeared on Law & Crime.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Matt Naham
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://lawandcrime.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.