CNN’s Jake Tapper is now at the center of a defamation lawsuit brought against the network over a 2021 story that focused on the disastrous withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan.
In a ruling this month, judges with the First District Court of Appeal for the State of Florida found that Zachary Young could proceed with a lawsuit for punitive damages after providing sufficient evidence to the court that a report smeared his security consulting company.
Young alleges the November 2021 story presented on CNN’s “The Lead with Jake Tapper” implied that his company, Nemex Enterprises Inc., profited by overcharging people fleeing Afghanistan during the Biden administration’s military withdrawal.
The judges’ ruling comes ahead of Thursday’s presidential debate between President Biden and former President Trump which Tapper is moderating along with Dana Bash.
The court document stated that Young “sufficiently proffered evidence of actual malice, express malice, and a level of conduct outrageous enough to open the door for him to seek punitive damages,” Fox News reported. “Whether Young can ultimately prevail is not the issue before us.”
A U.S. Navy veteran, Young alleged that CNN “destroyed his reputation and business by branding him an illegal profiteer who exploited desperate Afghans” in the November 11, 2021 edition of “The Lead.”
(Video Credit: CNN)
According to legal filings that referred to internal CNN emails:
“Young proffered CNN messages and emails that showed internal concern about the completeness and veracity of the reporting—the story is ‘a mess,’ ‘incomplete,’ not ‘fleshed out for digital,’ ‘the story is 80% emotion, 20% obscured fact,’ and ‘full of holes like Swiss cheese.’”
…
Young proffered internal communication showing, at minimum, CNN employees had little regard for him. In those messages, CNN employees called him a “sh-tbag” and “a-hole” and remarked they were “going to nail this Zachary Young mfucker.” Marquardt referred to him as “f–king Young” and quipped, “it’s your funeral bucko.” (…) Young sufficiently proffered evidence of actual malice, express malice, and a level of conduct outrageous enough to open the door for him to seek punitive damages.
In the segment on air, Tapper told viewers that ” many Afghans, Afghans who desperately want to flee Taliban rule and Afghans who say their lives are at stake, they remain behind. As CNN’s Alex Marquardt has discovered, Afghans trying to get out of the country, face a black market full of promises, demands of exorbitant fees, and no guarantee of safety or success.”
As the reporter then noted “desperate Afghans are being exploited” and have to pay “exorbitant, often impossible amounts” to flee the country, he used Young as an example of the costs allegedly being charged, with a picture of Young being displayed on the screen.
“We got Young’s number and called, but he didn’t pick up,” Marquardt reported, after noting that the prices being charged to transport fleeing residents were “well beyond the reach of most Afghans.”
No other names or companies were mentioned in the report and there were no facts offered about the inherent dangers of transporting people to safety in a country overtaken by the Taliban and abandoned by the U.S.
“In a text message, he told CNN that ‘Afghans trying to leave are expected to have sponsors pay for them. If someone reached out, we need to understand if they have a sponsor behind them to be able to pay evacuation costs which are highly volatile and based on environmental realities,’” Marquardt continued. “Young repeatedly declined to break down the cost or say if he’s making money.”
“In another message, that person offering those evacuations, Zachary Young, he wrote, ‘Availability is extremely limited and demand is high’ … he goes on to say, ‘That’s how economics works, unfortunately,’” Marquardt told CNN viewers as Tapper responded, “Unfortunately, hmm.”
The Media Research Center’s NewsBusters reported that “CNN has since deleted the segment in question from their CNN Transcripts archive page” and “There’s no note about the missing segment.”
“On appeal, CNN argues it did not intend to harm; its language was either opinion or ambiguous; and the internal communications were journalistic bravado that reflected a sincere belief in the reporting,” the judges wrote.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Frieda Powers
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.bizpacreview.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.