No politician dares to say “safe and effective” anymore in the UK Parliament. Why? Because it now seems that they can see the writing on the wall.
MP Andrew Bridgen revealed to Liz Gunn that his relentless efforts to highlight excess deaths have shattered the “safe and effective” narrative. Now, defenders of the shots are staring down a grim potential reality: “If they say ‘safe and effective’ now, I think they’re putting five to ten years on their sentence when we get them in court,” Bridgen said.
As a result, politicians have made a dramatic pivot. Instead of claiming the shots are “safe and effective,” they now refer to them as “the best solution.” This shift in language is a clear sign that the reckoning for the jabs is imminent, and officials are now scrambling to evade accountability.
Clip Transcript:
“The rate of information coming out with regard to the adverse events and deaths attributed to the so-called COVID-19 vaccines is increasing exponentially. No one dare say ‘safe and effective’ anymore in the UK Parliament. They call it ‘the best solution.’ ‘The best solution.’ But they can’t use ‘safe and effective.’ I mean, quite honestly, if they say ‘safe and effective’ now, I’m putting. I think they’re putting five to ten years on their sentence when we get them in court.”
Watch the full interview:
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Vigilant Fox
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://vigilantnews.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.