California News:
“Another COVID vaccine? Yes, and here’s why,” reads the headline from the San Jose Mercury News. This headline is not from 2021 – it was reported last week…. not long after the mainstream media proclaimed no positive COVID tests were reported in May, and the CDC officially dropped five-day covid isolation guidelines in March.
“Like the old arcade game, no matter how many shots we get, the enemy always pops back up,” says Lisa Krieger, a health reporter.
Krieger is the award-winning health journalist for the Bay Area News Group, who won the “first-place prize from the prestigious Association of Health Care Journalists.”
Krieger continued:
“But here’s why the new shot, recommended by FDA advisers last week, makes sense: It targets a new version of the virus, the FDA panel said. It bolsters your body’s ever-growing defense system. And it’s a lot better than getting very sick or hospitalized.”
First, pushing the Covid shot at all should be considered felonious, particularly with all of the recent studies admitting vaccine injuries, nasty side effects and people dropping dead right after a shot. Even as the CDC defined being “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination as having received at least one dose of a COVID-19 bivalent vaccine, in June 2023, The Cleveland Clinic confirmed “up to date” vaccinated people are at greater risk of getting Covid in this study.
At least members of the media who continue to push Covid pharmaceutical solutions should be questioned about motive, given that no skepticism has ever been expressed.
The USC Center for Healthcare Journalism touted Krieger’s Covid reporting:
“Amid the flood of coronavirus information, Krieger turns to reputable sources such as the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), where you can review state and national forecasts for hospital capacity, deaths and anticipated surges. She also regularly reads The New York Times coronavirus newsletter, STAT News, and the journal Science for its latest coronavirus news and research.
Other useful resources she tracks: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization (WHO) situation reports, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, and First Draft News.”
Dr. Peter McCullough recently published information about a federally funded study which demonstrated side effect symptoms associated with antibodies to spike protein:
“Measurement of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein is fundamental to the evaluation and management of COVID-19 vaccine injury syndromes because it is a proxy for the genetic production of the dangerous antigen by the vaccine.
I have been disappointed in the protocols of “Long-COVID” clinics which ignore both vaccination and the Spike protein as determinants of the syndrome. Likewise, there are a multitude of peer-reviewed manuscripts on both long-COVID syndrome and vaccine injuries that fail to mention or measure any proxy of Spike protein present in the human body.
Dutcher et al, published from the “Building Optimal Antibodies Study” funded by the National Institute of Aging, published an analysis of vaccine side effect symptoms and physiological measures six days after mRNA injection. The results clearly showed that neutralizing antibodies against the Spike protein were related to both symptoms and physical signs including body temperature and heart rate. These relationships became stronger with the second shot.
The US FDA warns against measuring COVID-19 antibodies as an indicator of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection since the vaccines have failed and provide no meaningful protection against the disease.”
Compare Dr. McCullough’s statements with SJMN’s Lisa Krieger’s:
“But here’s why the new shot, recommended by FDA advisers last week, makes sense: It targets a new version of the virus, the FDA panel said. It bolsters your body’s ever-growing defense system. And it’s a lot better than getting very sick or hospitalized.
Last year’s shot isn’t holding up. Protection against both infection and severe illness is waning.
“Effectiveness has decreased, as the time since vaccination has increased — and as new SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge,” said biostatistician Danyu Lin of the University of North Carolina School of Global Public Health, who presented worrisome new data to the FDA advisory panel.”
And this from Krieger:
“Last Wednesday, FDA’s advisers, a panel of physicians from hospitals and universities around the nation, unanimously voted to recommend a new vaccine. Vaccine manufacturers Pfizer and Moderna say they were prepared to make updated vaccines available in August, pending final FDA approval. As in previous years, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control will make specific recommendations for the elderly, immunocompromised, youth and other groups.
The new vaccine will target a variant of the ever-evolving coronavirus called JN.1. Last year’s vaccine was based on the XBB lineage of the virus.”
Dr. McCullough just published this Tuesday:
“I have several patients who have suffered multiple strokes after COVID-19 vaccination. The Spike protein is known to circulate in blood as shown by Brogna in half of vaccinated patients for at least six months. Other studies have demonstrated the Spike protein directly damages the wall of the blood vessels and causes blood clots.
The vast majority of events reported to VAERS are made by doctors and other healthcare providers who have determined the vaccine is the cause of the problem. Compared to influenza vaccines given over 34 years, COVID-19 vaccines in 36 months of use had over 1000-fold increased risk of most blood clot events, and compared to all vaccines combined administered over 34 years, this risk remained at over 200-times greater with COVID-19 vaccination.
The study Dr. McCullough cited reported:
“There are 5137 cerebral thromboembolism AEs reported in the 3 years (36 months) after COVID-19 vaccines compared to 52 AEs for the influenza vaccines over the past 34 years (408 months) and 282 AEs for all other vaccines (excluding COVID-19) over the past 34 years (408 months).”
He concludes:
“These data among others strongly support removing all COVID-19 vaccines and boosters from the market. No one should be put at risk for a serious stroke with any vaccine.”
Health Journalist Krieger claims, “Each additional shot helps. There is evidence that each vaccine or infection, especially in the first few months after receipt, provides added protection against critical illness and hospitalization,” when Dr. McCullough reports, “the vaccines have failed and provide no meaningful protection against the disease.”
What is an award-winning health journalist?
“The 2020 beat reporting award is based on Krieger’s coverage of the pandemic, ranging from how the virus infects people to why scientists believed vaccines would work,” the Bay Area News Group said.
The Association of Health Care Journalists (AHCJ) became a trade association in 2004, with a supporting charitable organization called the Center for Excellence in Health Care Journalism.
Krieger was featured in the Center for Health Journalism at USC for her Covid reporting in 2020:
“Amid the flood of coronavirus information, Krieger turns to reputable sources such as the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), where you can review state and national forecasts for hospital capacity, deaths and anticipated surges. She also regularly reads The New York Times coronavirus newsletter, STAT News, and the journal Science for its latest coronavirus news and research.
Other useful resources she tracks: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization (WHO) situation reports, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, and First Draft News.”
USC touts Krieger having “covered every angle of the coronavirus outbreak, from antibody testing to experimental new treatments.”
The only angle Krieger did not cover, and still does not cover, is a healthy journalistic skepticism of any of the agencies she uses as sources.
Her article reports that only “28% of American adults have been vaccinated with the latest vaccine.” She asks, “Why bother with another shot? Medical experts say there are still many reasons to get the jab…”
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Katy Grimes
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://californiaglobe.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.