A revelation by America First Legal (AFL), a conservative legal organization, has cast new doubts on the legality and rationale behind the 2022 FBI raid on former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence.
Fox News reported that the group presented a memo from the Obama-era Department of Defense which suggests that the federal government might have already been in possession of the documents that were seized during the raid.
The disclosure questions the necessity of the raid, citing possible prior government possession of the documents.
The memo uncovered by AFL, titled “Memorandum of Understanding Entered into by Presidential Information Technology Community Entities,” originates from 2015. It was created following a 2014 Russian cybersecurity breach of the Executive Office of the President’s network.
This breach prompted enhanced security measures for the executive branch’s information systems through the establishment of the PITC network.
Background Of The PITC Network Formation
AFL’s findings suggest that due to the protocols of the PITC network, the government could have retained either originals or copies of the classified documents that were later seized from Trump’s premises. These documents were part of the 33 boxes taken from Mar-a-Lago in August 2022, amidst escalating legal actions against the former president.
This operation was part of an investigation supervised by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith, appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Trump faces 40 felony counts and has pleaded not guilty to all charges, labeling the situation an “Election Interference Scam,” as per his defense.
The controversial memo was acquired by AFL through litigation directed at the Department of Defense, which refrained from commenting on inquiries from Fox News Digital regarding this situation. Additionally, the White House gave no immediate response when asked about the document.
Amid these developments, Judge Aileen Cannon revealed more than 300 pages relating to the Biden administration’s discussions with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) concerning Trump’s documents.
This included a request made by NARA in May 2021 to Trump for the return of specific original Presidential records that had not yet been transferred to it.
With the trial initially set for May 20 now delayed indefinitely, discussions around the appropriateness and legality of the raid continue. Dan Epstein, AFL’s Vice President, stated that their discoveries depict a troubling picture of the rule of law in Washington, where the former president faced a “politicized referral” that led to an “armed FBI raid of his home.”
Furthermore, Epstein criticized the Biden Administration for potentially avoiding normal procedures to retrieve records that he claimed were already within the government’s possession.
He argued that such measures could have circumvented what he referred to as an illegal referral process.
Rising Political Tensions And Investigations
Moving forward, the issue remains politically fiery. House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, R-Ky., focused on a different angle, questioning President Biden’s mental state and demanding audio recordings related to Biden’s handling of classified documents.
Comer’s remarks represent another facet of the heightened scrutiny and political tension surrounding this case.
In conclusion, the revelation from AFL raises significant questions about the motives and methods of the FBI’s raid on Trump’s home. The implications this has on previous government operations, the handling of classified information, and the broader political ramifications continue to unfold, stirring ongoing debates on the integrity and transparency of governmental actions.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Christina Davie
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://americandigest.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.