Executive summary
Thanks to your help in responding to my last survey, it took less than 3 hours to answer the question as to whether sexual orientation, gender identity and gender dysphoria are influenced by vaccines.
The answer to all three is yes: the greater someone is vaccinated, the more likely they are to exhibit each of these traits.
For all three measures, the odds ratios were 4.8 or higher which means that the attributable fraction is 79.2%.
In other words, vaccines are responsible for nearly 80% of the effect size.
So the mystery is over. We now know the cause.
The survey
The survey was announced here.
The data
The source data is here.
The analysis
You can find the analysis here.
The odds ratios
Here are the odds ratio between the fully vaccinated/fully unvaccinated. Odds ratios >2 are traditionally associated with causality:
-
Sexual orientation: 4.78
-
Gender identity: 4.81
-
Gender dysphoria: 5.54
These effects are huge and consistent.
Also, the odds ratios for partially vaccinated are in line with the fully vaccinated: in general, the greater the number of vaccines someone has, the more likely they are to have a trait that differs from traditional norms.
We have biological plausibility
It’s unlikely that these effects are correlated to something else.
We have biological plausibility which is required for making a causality assessment using the Bradford Hill criteria. See: How Vaccines Alter Intimate Relationships and Gender Identity.
Bias in the survey
I have more unvaccinated readers than most journalists. This enables me to get reasonable sample sizes for people in the fully vaxxed vs. unvaxxed cohorts with just 750 responses. Other writers would need 100X as many respondents to get an equivalent number of responses from fully unvaccinated people.
The mix of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated respondents is irrelevant to the odds ratio calculation.
In other words, if all of my readers are all “anti-vaxxers” it simply doesn’t matter. If half of them are fully unvaccinated, it doesn’t skew the results at all; in fact, it makes the results more accurate.
So claims that the survey is unduly “biased” are without merit; all surveys are biased. The question is whether the biases impact the outcome.
If I got it wrong, please show us the correct data.
AFAIK, nobody wants to collect the data for some reason.
Summary
The data I collected clearly and unambiguously shows that vaccines are the primary cause (79% attributable fraction) of deviation from traditional norms relative to:
-
Sexual orientation
-
Gender identity
-
Sexual dysphoria
If I’m wrong, you need to show us all the data showing this is not the case.
I’ll wait.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Steve Kirsch
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://stevekirsch.substack.com/ and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.