RFK Jr. slashes $122M from LGBT, diversity initiatives at HHS

In a sweeping bureaucratic shift, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., appointed by the Trump administration, has drastically cut funding to various educational and research programs focusing on LGBT and diversity topics within the Department of Health and Human Services, as the Daily Mail reports.

Nearly $122 million was axed from grants enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion — affecting institutions nationwide.

The targeted reductions, initiated in March, were part of a broader administrative effort to focus on what the Trump administration deems critical health missions, delineating from programs concentrated excessively on race and sexual orientation topics.

These cuts were executed in collaboration with the newly established Department of Government Efficiency, aiming specifically at DEI initiatives.

Details of cuts emerge

Among the impacted, the National Cancer Institute retracted $5.5 million from the ‘Vanderbilt FIRST’ initiative at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. This program was designed to recruit and support diverse faculty members. Additionally, Drexel University faced a withdrawal of more than $4.6 million intended for similar diversity efforts in health disparities research.

The University of Virginia was also significantly impacted, losing funding for a project that studied neurodevelopmental biomarkers in diverse autism groups. This constituted part of a broader $12 million endowment announced in 2022, aiming to bolster inclusive research across various disciplines.

Further, the University of Michigan felt the sting of these budget retractions, losing $1.1 million earmarked for Alzheimer’s Disease research focused on inclusivity across Asian American and Latino communities.

Political ramifications, opposition unfold

The reduction in funding comes on the heels of Kennedy’s controversial decision to dismiss the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Dr. Susan Monarez. RFK Jr. appointed Jim O’Neill, a deputy at HHS linked to the Peter Thiel Foundation, as the acting director amid these budgetary cuts.

Despite facing internal protests from various sectors within the health community, the White House has shown steadfast support for Kennedy’s actions. This endorsement has sparked concerns among health advocates about the potential for further erosions of support for diversity-focused health initiatives.

The future landscape of funding within HHS remains riddled with uncertainties. Speculations about additional cuts linger, with announcements of further reductions made as recently as this month, leaving many in the community anxious about the sustainability of long-term health diversity programs.

Extent of impact awaited

The cuts have throttled the breadth of research and education programs formerly supported by these grants. Institutions that once thrived on federal support for pioneering inclusive health research find themselves scrambling to secure alternative funding sources to continue their work.

Stakeholders at affected universities have expressed disappointment and concern, emphasizing how these financial cutbacks undermine years of progress in diversifying the biomedical research arena and widening the inclusivity of health education.

This turn of events places many ongoing research projects in jeopardy, particularly those meant to serve underrepresented communities, potentially hindering advancements in crucial public health areas. The educational and developmental repercussions of these cuts, critics suggest, may echo far beyond the immediate fiscal year, affecting future generations of researchers and healthcare professionals.

Funding debates persist

As Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s actions under the Trump administration steer the Department of Health and Human Services in new directions, the debate over the role of federal funding in supporting diverse educational programs intensifies.

This has become a pivotal point of discussion regarding the balance between government oversight and academic freedom.

Critics argue that cutting funds aimed at advancing DEI could set back decades of progress toward inclusivity in healthcare settings and academic institutions.

On the other hand, proponents of the cuts cite a need for a more focused spending approach that prioritizes broad-based health outcomes over demographic-specific initiatives.

As the situation evolves, the health and academic communities remain vigilant, keeping a keen eye on Washington’s next moves. The decisions made today could well define the trajectory of America’s health research and educational landscape for years to come.

The post RFK Jr. slashes $122M from LGBT, diversity initiatives at HHS appeared first on Washington Digest.