By Paul Homewood
h/t Paul Kolk
The usual lies from the BBC:
Andrew Davies was on his way to New Zealand to work on a Doctor Who exhibition, for which he was project manager. The first leg of his flight from London to Singapore was fairly smooth. Then suddenly the plane hit severe turbulence.
“Being on a rollercoaster is the only way I can describe it,” he recalls. “After being pushed into my seat really hard, we suddenly dropped. My iPad hit me in the head, coffee went all over me. There was devastation in the cabin with people and debris everywhere.
“People were crying and [there was] just disbelief about what had happened.”
Mr Davies was, he says, “one of the lucky ones”.
Other passengers were left with gashes and broken bones. Geoff Kitchen, who was 73, died of a heart attack.
Death as a consequence of turbulence is extremely rare. There are no official figures but there are estimated to have been roughly four deaths since 1981. Injuries, however, tell a different story, official figures from the National Transportation Safety Board show. (Of these, 166 were crew and may not have been seated.)
But as climate change shifts atmospheric conditions, experts warn that air travel could become bumpier: temperature changes and shifting wind patterns in the upper atmosphere are expected to increase the frequency and intensity of severe turbulence.
“We can expect a doubling or tripling in the amount of severe turbulence around the world in the next few decades,” says Professor Paul Williams, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Reading.
Full story here.
Far from there being “no official figures”, the NTSB, which the BBC themselves quote, are absolutely clear – the number of turbulence-related accidents are not increasing; since the 1990s, the trend is flat:
https://www.ntsb.gov/safety/safety-studies/Documents/SS2101.pdf
The BBC make this meaningless statement:
“In the US alone, there have been 207 severe injuries – where an individual has been admitted to hospital for more than 48 hours – since 2009”
Well, so what. The clear intention is to deceive readers into believing that this number is unusual and much higher than before. This is then followed by predictions of climate related increases in years to come, in order to emphasise the supposed link.
Readers would no doubt form rather different conclusions, if they had been provided with the actual data at the beginning.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Paul Homewood
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
