President Donald Trump dropped a bombshell on Friday, turning the spotlight away from himself and onto some heavy hitters in the Jeffrey Epstein saga.
Breitbart reported that while addressing reporters before jetting off to Scotland, Trump challenged the media to dig into the connections between disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, former President Bill Clinton, and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers.
Trump was crystal clear in his remarks to the press, pointing out what he sees as a glaring double standard in media coverage.
“You ought to be speaking about Bill Clinton, who went to the island 28 times,” Trump insisted, referring to Epstein’s infamous Little Saint James, often dubbed “Epstein Island.” Well, isn’t it curious how some folks seem to skate by while others face endless scrutiny?
Trump Denies Island Visits, Challenges Narrative
For his part, Trump was adamant that he never set foot on Epstein’s island, a claim he repeated with conviction during the nearly 25-minute exchange with reporters. “I never went to the island,” he declared, drawing a stark contrast between himself and others.
The president didn’t shy away from addressing a peculiar rumor floated by the Wall Street Journal about an alleged inappropriate letter he wrote to Epstein back in 2003.
Trump dismissed the story outright, questioning its authenticity. “I don’t even know what they’re talking about,” he said, suggesting it could be another fabricated hit job.
Adding fuel to the fire, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that the Wall Street Journal doesn’t even possess this supposed letter. If a major outlet can’t produce the evidence, shouldn’t the story be shelved rather than peddled as fact? It’s almost as if some in the media are more interested in headlines than truth.
Trump’s most pointed jab was reserved for Bill Clinton, whom he accused of making frequent trips to Epstein’s private island.
The figure he cited—28 visits—raises eyebrows and begs for deeper investigation. If true, that’s a lot of mileage for someone who hasn’t faced the same level of public grilling as others.
While Trump hammered on Clinton’s alleged connection, he also name-dropped Larry Summers, implying that the former Treasury Secretary’s ties to Epstein deserve equal attention. Why, one might ask, does the media seem so selective about which names to chase? It’s a fair question in an era where narratives often trump facts.
Trump didn’t stop there, taking a broader swipe at what he sees as systemic dishonesty among his political opponents. “Everything’s fake with the Democrats,” he charged, linking the Epstein letter rumor to other discredited stories. Sounds like he’s fed up with what he perceives as constant fabrications.
Trump’s Departure and Upcoming Scotland Trip
After laying out his case, Trump wrapped up the impromptu press session and boarded Marine One, leaving the White House behind. His destination was Joint Base Andrews, from where he’d embark on a trip to Scotland.
In Scotland, Trump is slated to meet with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for what promises to be an important diplomatic engagement. The two leaders are scheduled to dine at Trump Turnberry and visit Trump Aberdeen, blending business with a touch of personal branding.
Trade discussions are also on the agenda, with Trump hinting at some “fine-tuning” to the existing U.K.-U.S. trade deal. It’s a reminder that even amidst domestic controversies, international relations don’t take a backseat.
The Epstein controversy, with its web of high-profile names, remains a lightning rod in American politics, and Trump’s latest comments ensure it won’t fade quietly. His decision to redirect attention toward Clinton and Summers could either force a reckoning or simply stir more partisan mudslinging.
Yet, one thing is undeniable: the public deserves clarity on who was truly entangled with Epstein and to what extent. If Trump’s numbers and claims hold water, the media might need to rethink its priorities. After all, sunlight is the best disinfectant, even if it’s uncomfortable for some.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Mae Slater
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.conservativejournalreview.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
