Notorious judge releases woman who threatened to kill Trump

A woman who threatened to kill President Trump was released from jail by a notorious liberal judge in Washington D.C. 

James Boasberg became widely known earlier this year for ordering President Trump to turn back deportation flights carrying alleged gang members.

In another stunning move, Boasberg decided to cut loose a mentally disturbed woman who traveled to the nation’s capital to “sacrificially kill” Trump, Law & Crime reported.

The 50-year-old, Nathalie Rose Jones, had been denied bond by a different judge who was alarmed by her persistent threats, which culminated in Jones driving more than 200 miles from her residence in New York City to the White House.

Boasberg strikes again

Boasberg felt that it was a case of a troubled, but harmless woman without any practical means of executing her plan.

“If she had a gun with her this case is easy,” Boasberg said, according to local CBS affiliate WUSA. “But the question is, why shouldn’t we consider this the rantings of someone with a mental illness with no ability to carry this out?”

The judge ordered Jones, who reportedly has schizophrenia, to get psychiatric help and undergo electronic monitoring in New York, where she lives.

Jones had shared a series of graphic social media posts last month calling Trump a dictator and blaming him for lives lost to COVID-19.

“I literally told FBI in five states today that I am willing to sacrificially kill this POTUS by disemboweling him and cutting out his trachea with Liz Cheney and all The Affirmation present,” she wrote in one post.

In an interview with the Secret Service, Jones said she would kill Trump if given the chance, specifically by using a “bladed object.”

Several of her posts had troubling militaristic overtones, the Justice Department noted. In one of them, she urged Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to remove Trump by force.

Grand jury declines

The Justice Department had urged Boasberg to keep Jones behind bars, pointing to her repeated public threats and the effort she made to carry them out by traveling to the nation’s capital.

“Defendant is the exact type of person that should be detained pending trial. She displays a penchant for violence, as displayed through her threats towards the POTUS. She does not care about the consequences of her statements and actions, as shown by her brazen decision to drive to Washington, DC, the day after telling law enforcement she would take the POTUS’s life. And she has mental health issues, which could affect her ability to exhibit self-control or cause her to discount the dangerousness of her actions going forward,” the DOJ wrote.

These arguments failed to move Boasberg, who reversed the ruling of US Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya that called for Jones to receive a competency evaluation from jail.

The prosecution’s case suffered another blow Monday when a grand jury refused to charge Jones.

It is exceedingly rare for grand juries to decline criminal charges, but grand juries in D.C. have blocked several cases from being brought since Trump took over the crime-plagued capital in August. The unusual pattern has led to speculation that grand jurors in the liberal city are using their role in the justice system to send a political message.

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro condemned the grand jury’s move as proof that the justice system in D.C. has been corrupted by politics.

“The system here is broken on many levels,” Pirro said in a statement. “Instead of the outrage that should be engendered by a specific threat to kill the president, the grand jury in DC refuses to even let the judicial process begin. Justice should not depend on politics.”