1. Another excellent example, Taylor made really, of how controlled opposition works.
The dialectical or communist state wants the total destruction of freedom of speech. To get that, they have to make you thi8nk it’s in your interests to have speech illegal. As many kinds as possible. Ideally under a rubric the state can arbitrarily define as needs be.
Hate speech is perfect. It’s like Islamic blasphemy laws, except more adjustable to whatever it is the state doesn’t want you to say or think that day, and subject to change without notice.
Next to hate speech laws, Islamic blasphemy laws are mercifully consistent and transparent.
Pierre Poilievre takes advantage of the stabbing of a Jewish woman by a rabid anti-Israel, anti-semite at a Loblaws with a small kosher section on Wednesday to make an appeal for more and stronger “hate-speech” laws. Many people, and nearly all Jewish people will support this. Which is stunning given that Canada already has totalitarian hate speech laws, which have not been enforced against the left and Muslims demanding harm come to Israel and the Jewish people, but has been applied to whoever the state decides is a “vulnerable group” that day. Itself a term of control that lets the state continue to maneuver us all along whatever path is most destructive to Western culture, people and history.
Pierre Poilievre
I am outraged by yet another vile antisemitic attack, this time at a grocery store in Ottawa. Targeting people because they are Jewish is disgusting, un-Canadian, and must be met with the full force of the law. Jewish Canadians should never have to fear walking into their place of worship, sending their kids to school, or getting groceries. I call on the Prime Minister to ensure there are serious consequences for those who commit or incite antisemitic crimes — including stronger hate-crime laws, and the deportation of non-Canadians who come here to spread hatred. We must eradicate the growing scourge of antisemitism in Canada. Never again means never again.The answer to the problem is more freedom of speech. Not less. And the deporting of people who do not obey our laws, or hold our value.
Whether is rubric of “hate-crimes laws” includes hate speech or not, the same applies. A crime is a crime. Assault, attempted murder etc. is what it is. It is or should be up to the judge to factor motive into the sentencing. If it is a crime of hatred of a stranger because the attacker associates his victim with a group he hates, there can be extra sentencing layered on top or not. But trying to stab someone is a very serious crime. That should be enough. We must be equals before the law. That is a corner stone of the West overall. The moment you have favoured groups as either victims or perps, which is clearly happening in Canada and across the West (perhaps with special emphasis on the UK) civilization is going over a cliff. And that is clearly the intention here.
A huge part of the very Judeo-Christian component of Western culture is the idea of the sacredness of life. Unless;ike Islam, Jewish law for example, allows the eating of pork and a lot of other rules to be broken if it means saving ones own, or the life of another. Christianity kept this tradition in spirit and letter of the law. Murder is still the worst thing you can do, or at least culturally if that is no longer the case in law perhaps.
It has been our suspicion that part of the reason the communists made abortion a sacrament, is that it is a direct intersectional or dialectical attack on the sanctity of life overall. The state wants total power over life and death and cannot tolerate a religion that puts god and life above the state. This also explains the seeming contradiction between my-body-my-choice with abortion, and you have to take a potentially lethal injection to save your grandma with zero evidence to show why. In both cases it is the body belonging to the state, even if abortion is a partial measure. Canada’s slippery slope with assisted suicide is a lot closer to the end game. The parameters are widening quickly in terms of who qualifies to have the state murder them.
Granted, I am using the term murder incorrectly, since after all, whether we know it or not, we usually use the word “murder” to mean killing without the right permission. Meaning of course, permission by the state. If its the death penalty or killing someone in war or self defence, well once upon a time anyway, that was not murder.
Even biblically that remains true, as the commandment actually reads, “Though shalt not murder”. But the bible creates rational conditions for killing another, like self defence. So we can see why the state wants to be rid of Judaism and Christianity. Only the state should have that power, and when it does, everyone not aligned with state doctrine is a candidate. And the statistics on who seems to be the recipient of state driven death should tell you exactly who is, and is not aligned.
From the Daily Mail:
Canada‘s assisted suicide laws have continued rapidly expanding in recent years, with a group of doctors now pushing for disabled newborn babies to be euthanized.
The demand for euthanasia is so high that doctors who provide it cannot keep up, according to a new report by The Atlantic.
Assisted dying, legalized in 2016, now accounts for about one out of 20 deaths in Canada, far surpassing countries where it’s been legal for longer.
As assisted deaths have become a major part of Canada’s health care system, the Quebec College of Physicians suggested legalizing euthanasia for infants born severely ill.
As The Atlantic noted, the practice is legal in the Netherlands – the first country to adopt it since Nazi Germany did it in 1939.
In 2022, Louis Roy from the Quebec College of Physicians raised the notion of euthanasia for babies up to a year old ‘who are born with severe deformations, very grave and severe medical syndromes, whose life expectancy and level of suffering are such that it would make sense to ensure that they do not suffer.’
While parents already have the option of stopping treatment for babies suffering from medical conditions, the proposal would accelerate the infant’s death, sparking questions about consent.
However you may feel about the issue as framed by the DM, the slippery slope argument remains valid.
3. Many times over the past few years, we have explored one of CBC’s main informational weapon tactics. That is the one of appearing to speak truth to power, in order to make the power more powerful. For example during Covid, they would never present a truly opposite PoV to the narrative, even Pfizer’s own documents showing that the Vaxx did not prevent covid and that a side effect of it was in fact Covid. Instead, they would have angry people on and ‘experts’ who would demand that the state did more to crush our rights. Someone someone Kaplan in Ottawa is one excellent example. An MD that wore a mask even on Zoom calls when alone. She ended up on school boards agitating for the most harsh measures possible and operated ferociously against ideological opponents.
She was far from the only one, but it is the only name I can summon at the moment.
THIS protest they give lots of coverage to.
CBC News recently reported on a small protest outside its Winnipeg offices, claiming dissatisfaction with the broadcaster’s coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict. The August 16th article entitled: “Rally outside Winnipeg CBC building protests broadcaster’s Gaza coverage,” portrayed the CBC as being under fire for not being sufficiently critical of Israel — for allegedly failing to amplify Palestinian voices or adopt activist rhetoric like “genocide.” The suggestion is, of course, outrageous. The CBC’s record is not one of downplaying Palestinian perspectives but of grotesquely skewed, one-sided reporting against Israel. To frame the broadcaster as guilty of under-representing anti-Israel narratives ignores reality, flips the truth on its head, and seriously misinforms Canadians.
The report which was produced by Erin Brohman, a journalist for CBC Manitoba, emphasized the protesters’ calls for an independent review of the network’s Gaza coverage and cited claims from the Canadian Palestinian Association of Manitoba about “censoring, obfuscating and neglecting the truth.” It spotlighted emotional appeals from teenaged students and other activists, asserting that Israel is engaged in “genocide” against Palestinians. The article also referenced 192 journalists killed since the war began, including Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif, along with the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry’s (false) claims of malnutrition-related deaths – all without providing critical context.
Click through to read the whole article. It is good, as one would expect from Honest Reporting. But the tight focus of that organization causes it to undersell its own case as well as fail to see the bigger picture. Which makes it actually harder for people to understand the real play.
There are something like 150 wars in the world today.
A substantial fraction of them are Muslims on one or both sides.
Many of those wars are truly genocidal wars by Muslims against non Muslims because they are non Muslims. I mean truly genocidal where the entire population of a Christian village in Africa are exterminated by jihadis, and the women kidnapped as sex slaves. Sex slaves, even though Muslims might call them ‘wives’. A cynical rhetorical trick that many buy into, like referring to the founder of Islam as “The Prophet Mohammad”.
CBC would not cover any of those, except for the briefest of moments. Perhaps when Michelle Obama focussed on the kidnapping of many African women as sex slaves, the CBC would parrot her voice. But at no time did they explain how Islam makes that legal, and a core doctrine and incentive of its ‘faith’.
Below, a couple of protests against CBC itself a couple of years ago at its main offices in Ottawa Canada on Sparks st.
Here is a fairly large one from Nov. 2021
IF CBC covered it, they would have framed it quite differently.
And this was a tiny one in Jan. of 2023
A couple of videos from that protest: that make the point well.
These are protests of CBC and its methods. The one Honest Reporting pointed out are likely funded by them, or funded by the same agencies that fund CBC.
Here is CBC on protests against state narratives on immigration in Australia:
Some first rate deflection and deception in the latter part of that video.
The low hanging fruit here is if it is NOT TRUE that Australia is swamped by ‘immigration’ then why is the government working hard to reduce the numbers? The clay pot fallacy.
But the rest of it, while subtle, is no less enemy propaganda.
One wonders what the percentage is for people at CBC to destroy their own culture, history and people.
4. STD vaccines are being given to NEW BORNS
5. CANADIANS Pay attention to this one. Remember, The Commonwealth is coming down in the same way across the board.
Australia contemplates a tax on spare bedrooms. You know, the country that insists there is not a mass immigration wave.
WE DO NOT AGREE with the analysis of the video above on the Commonwealth. This was created by international communists. NOT the pattern this video claims. But the destruction of the Commonwealth is correct.
Thank you all for checking out this site and its views.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Eeyore
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://vladtepesblog.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
