Debbie Lerman provides stirring statement that we know to be true & she remains at the tip of the battle unwilling to let the COVIDian OWS & Malone Bourla mRNA vaccine killers go; I support her work!

Are they sitting there laughing at you? I think so. The joke is on us.

Why do you think the HHS Secretary has failed to end the PREP Act emergency Declaration for Covid? James Roguski is doing tremendous work to help get the PREP Act ended. He wants to make it a political issue for the midterms and force congresspersons and senators to vote it down.

Why has RFK Jr. not ended the blanket legal indemnity granted through the PREP Act?

He can, he has not. Why?

My view, HHS, CDC, NIH, FDA etc. continue to terrorize us with these mRNA vaccines and all done thus far under Trump 2.0 is garbage, a game, read and look carefully, all being told to you is spin and politics to bullshit you and Lerman know this. As long as the PREP Act remain in place, under Azar and now under RFK Jr., then all they do is a joke, a deceit. The PREP Act is the rate limiting step and RFK Jr. knows one thing he had to do was to end the PREP Act. The ONLY thing. He did not. Why? Why do you think? Do you not see the role of Oz, RFK Jr., Jay, Prasad, Makary is to maintain mRNA? Do you not understand no study can be run to prove any of these so-called vaccines work, and these people know it, the baseline risk is zero, no study can be mounted to assess anything. They are lying to you. They are duplicitous now. They are laughing at you.

Do you think we are in an emergency? Why has RFK Jr. failed to end the emergency and the PREP Act linked to COVID? Ask yourself that. I like Bobby, I support him and think he is among the best there, I think he means well but he is not being honest with the nation…you think he is there to right wrongs…he is not…he has failed. It is a game that I am afraid even RFK Jr. is playing on the nation. He is powerless, he can do nothing. They can make it look like lots being done.

Sorry to say and all you out there with the bullshit or ‘well Paul, wait a bit, things in time, step by step, little steps’…that’s bullshit, that is all pie in the sky drivel and bull, mRNA vaccine will never be ended. As Malone collects his horses’ sperm to sell it to you, he is laughing at you, he even is on a vaccine committee…ha ha ha ha…

These people are lawyers, playing legal language games with you. Nothing is going to be done about nothing, unless we get back to the polls and vote them out properly. All of them.

All else is a game, a joke. Praise to Debbie.

Start here:

‘mRNA Vaccines DID NOT UNDERGO a legally regulated drug approval or manufacturing process

It is important to recognize that an EUA is not part of the development pathway; it is an entirely separate entity that is used only during emergency situations and is not part of the drug approval process. (2009 Institute of Medicine of the National Academies publication, p. 28)

All mRNA products on the market and in development today became available as a result of the declared Covid pandemic, through legal pathways intended for CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear) emergencies – in other words, war or terror incidents involving weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

These WMD-related laws include Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and blanket legal indemnity granted through the PREP Act.

The manufacturing agreements for the Covid mRNA vaccines were military Other Transaction Agreements (OTA) signed by the Pentagon. This type of “other than contract” agreement is intended to supply the military with cutting-edge technology while bypassing pesky regulations and red tape. It is not intended for civilian use.

No Regulatory Oversight = No Scientifically Valid Claims

These laws and contractual instruments do not require any regulatory oversight for the development, manufacture, distribution, or administration of countermeasures covered under the EUA and PREP Act. Any oversight activities, clinical investigations, or reporting of trial methods/practices/results are entirely voluntary on the part of the developers/manufacturers.

In other words, any trials, inspections, experiments, or other activities carried out on these products do not have to comply with any safety standards, laws, or regulations that apply to the development of non-emergency medical products.

This is not speculation or interpretation. It is the letter of the law. These articles will walk you through the convoluted legalese:

• What is EUA?

• What is the PREP Act?

According to these laws and the OTA contracts, the developers/manufacturers of the countermeasures are solely responsible for conducting whatever trials or experiments they choose, under whatever conditions they want, with whatever reporting standards they decide to follow. There is no enforceable legal or regulatory oversight on any of these activities.

THEREFORE, any claims about the products made by the manufacturers are NOT based on clinical trials conducted according to regulatory guidelines or scientific standards and CANNOT be the basis for regulatory approval under non-EUA drug development frameworks.

This is stated very clearly in the quote at the beginning of this article, which I will repeat here. (It was brought to light by Katherine Watt, who has done the most thorough and extensive research on these and related laws):

It is important to recognize that an EUA is not part of the development pathway; it is an entirely separate entity that is used only during emergency situations and is not part of the drug approval process. (2009 Institute of Medicine of the National Academies publication, p. 28)

Here’s how the FDA and CDC explain what EUA means, compared to other “Access Mechanisms” for medical products:

Here’s what this table tells us about EUA:

1. The process of granting EUA is not likely to generate any information about a product’s effectiveness.

2. The process of granting EUA is not designed to provide evidence of safety or effectiveness, but safety signals might be identified.

3. It is unlikely that, once a product is granted EUA and administered to some patients, any useful information will be obtained to benefit any future patients.

4. There is no systematic data collection on effectiveness or safety with EUA, and no data is published in medical journals as part of the regulatory approval process.

5. No informed consent is required, but patients who “volunteer” to take the product must be told they can refuse and that the product is unapproved/available under EUA.

6. No institutional review board (IRB) is required. [IRB is a board that is supposed to protect the well-being of human subjects in clinical trials.]

One important note: The last line in this table references “access to investigational product” which legally applies only to the “Clinical Trial” and “Expanded Access” categories. The term “investigational” is misapplied in the case of EUA, because EUA precludes legally binding investigation, and only covers countermeasures which, by definition, are non-investigational. I know this sounds extremely convoluted to the point of absurdity, but that’s how these laws are (I would contend intentionally) written, to confuse and obfuscate. Sasha Latypova provides a detailed explication of this legal morass.

Here’s what this means in terms of potential harms caused by these products, and the ability to hold anyone legally accountable for them:

• The process through which the products were developed and manufactured was not expected by regulators, lawmakers, or anyone else to produce any useful information regarding safety or efficacy. Therefore, any claims related to safety or efficacy were purely promotional and not based on any scientifically validatable data.

• There is not, nor has there ever been, any requirement to follow up on any safety signals that may or may not be detected in the process of the unregulated experiments conducted on these products.

• Even if safety signals are detected and people are harmed or killed, no one who tests, develops, manufactures, distributes, administers, or does anything else related to these products is legally liable.

• As long as these products are covered by an emergency PREP Act declaration, this legal framework remains intact.

Questions to Ask Anyone Addressing Covid mRNA Vaccines

Given this information about how Covid mRNA vaccines were developed and manufactured, I would argue that any investigation of their potential harms or benefits must necessarily begin with an acknowledgement that they were never subjected to any non-EUA drug development regulations or legal oversight.

In addition, it must be acknowledged that they are still covered by the PREP Act, which is based on a declaration by the HHS Secretary that we are in an emergency, or potential emergency, related to Covid-19. The current PREP Act declaration is in effect until December 2029. The HHS Secretary has the sole discretion and power to end that declaration.

So when someone sits down to interview a regulator who claims to be undertaking an investigation of Covid mRNA vaccines, or writes an article about “giving the Covid vaccines a good hard look,” I would at the very least expect the topic of EUA/PREP Act to be mentioned.

It never is.

Here are some questions to ask a CDC or FDA regulator, or a MAHA enthusiast, if you find yourself talking to one at a cocktail party, or if you are a journalist interviewing them or writing about their activities:

• Do you know that the mRNA vaccines on the market and in trials now were all developed under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)?

• Do you know that EUA was intended to rush countermeasures to the battlefield or the site of a CBRN attack and is not part of the drug approval process?

• Do you know that Covid mRNA vaccines are covered by the PREP Act, which means no one can be held legally liable for any activity related to their development, manufacture, distribution, administration, or anything else?

• Do you know the PREP Act was intended to cover medical countermeasures rushed to the scene of a CBRN emergency – not to a disease outbreak involving billions of civilians? Do you know that it was considered unconstitutional by many lawmakers at the time of its covert and rushed passing?

• Do you know that PREP Act and EUA-covered countermeasures do not require any follow-up if/when safety signals are detected?

• Given this information, what do you believe the claims of “safe and effective” for these products are based on?

• Given this information, would you agree that the only way to put mRNA products on a legal regulatory pathway is to subject them to the same laws/regulations that govern the development and manufacturing of non-emergency medical products? And that this means they must undergo legally binding, regulated clinical trials outside the EUA/PREP Act CBRN emergency framework?

• In the mean time, while we’re waiting for the years that it will take such legally regulated trials to take place, do you agree that anyone who wants to get, or is recommended by a healthcare professional or regulatory agency to receive, an mRNA product — including in the context of clinical trials — should be notified of its status as an EUA/PREP Act-covered countermeasure?

Will you join the efforts to ask the Secretary to end the emergency and to repeal the PREP Act entirely?

Do you believe we are still in a Covid-19 emergency warranting blanket legal protection for all countermeasures until the end of 2029? If not, why do you think the HHS Secretary has failed to end the PREP Act emergency Declaration for Covid?’

___

You must not wait for another catastrophic crisis (at times manufactured but we are prevented from making our own basic personal decisions or accessing needed drugs and response tools) to catch you off-guard. We must take charge and be prepared today so that we can enjoy peace of mind tomorrow.

Enter the Wellness Company as a solution and a willing participant in the health care conversation. The Wellness Company, launched in 2022, offers health care, prescriptions, and supplements, all backed by research

The Wellness Company isn’t chasing profits — it’s trying to help people recover. While the government continues pushing vaccines, The Wellness Company is focusing on real solutions.

From telemedicine, prescriptions, memberships, and supplements, TWC is leading America with alternative choices to the traditional health care model.

Please consider support of a good PATRIOT company (in this PATRIOT economy) Drs. McCullough, Risch, Thorp, myself support (they are our sponsors), The Wellness Company; see the emergency preparation kit (key component being antibiotics you were denied by doctors, pharmacists, governments during the fraud COVID), first aid kit, travel emergency kit, contagion control kit etc. Please consider the SPIKE SUPPORT (spike protein DETOX dissolving spike from mRNA vaccine, this is critical to remove spike form the mRNA vaccine/and DNA viral vector) formula with NATTOKINASE as well as the triple formula (SPIKE SUPPORT, BROMELAIN, CIRCUMIN)

If you wish to give a donation to help me, you can at:

Zelle:

[email protected]

Or Ko-Fi

Ko-fi.com/drpauleliasalexander

Or to my address at:

150 South 8th Street

Unit 170

Lewiston, New York

14092

Alternatively, please consider going from an UNPAID subscriber or follower to a PAID at $5 per month or $30 per year. This can provide me help. If this is not possible at this time, this is ok, please remain a subscriber for FREE and there is no difference between FREE and PAID. No restrictions.