A legal battle within one of rock’s most iconic bands threatens to redefine the music industry’s approach to royalty distribution.
Story Highlights
- Andy Summers and Stewart Copeland of The Police sue Sting for millions in unpaid royalties.
- The dispute centers around the mega-hit “Every Breath You Take.”
- Legal action follows years of failed negotiations.
- The case could set a precedent for future royalty disputes in the music industry.
Musical Royalty Dispute in the Spotlight
In one of the music industry’s most high-profile royalty disputes, Andy Summers and Stewart Copeland, former members of the legendary band The Police, have filed a lawsuit against Sting. The legal action, initiated in London’s High Court, claims millions in lost royalties, particularly from their hit song, “Every Breath You Take.” This lawsuit follows decades of disagreements and unsuccessful attempts to reach an out-of-court settlement.
Historical Context of the Dispute
Formed in the late 1970s, The Police became one of the most successful bands of the 1980s. Their track “Every Breath You Take” remains one of the most lucrative songs in history. Sting, registered as the sole composer, has received the majority of the royalties, reportedly earning approximately £550,000 ($740,500) annually. Summers and Copeland argue that their creative contributions are undervalued, leading to this legal challenge.
The case, listed under “general commercial contracts and arrangements” in London’s High Court, highlights the ongoing struggle within the music industry over legacy catalog management and fair compensation for all contributing artists.
Implications and Industry Impact
The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant ramifications for the music industry. A decision favoring Summers and Copeland could prompt changes in how royalties are distributed for legacy catalogs, potentially inspiring similar legal actions from other artists. The case also underscores the need for increased transparency in royalty arrangements, potentially leading to regulatory reforms.
Sources:
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Editor
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://republicanpost.net and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
