Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents just got a wake-up call from the Department of Homeland Security: ditch those Sig Sauer P320 pistols. A July 9, 2025, memo, leaked to Breitbart News, demands a swift switch to Glock 19 MOS handguns. It’s a bold move, and the timing—amid lawsuits dogging the P320—raises eyebrows.
The directive, penned by DHS Deputy Director Madison D. Sheahan, orders ICE Authorized Officers to stop carrying certain Sig Sauer P320 models and transition to Glock 19 MOS pistols by October 2025. This isn’t just a cosmetic change; it’s a response to legal heat and a push to modernize gear. ICE’s Office of Firearms and Tactical Programs is scrambling to make it happen.
Sheahan’s memo doesn’t mince words: all P320 models are off the table for ICE officers. The replacement Glocks will come loaded with micro red dot sights, weapon-mounted lights, and both duty and concealed carry holsters. It’s a full overhaul, and the feds mean business.
Urgent Timeline for Transition
The Office of Firearms and Tactical Programs has a tight deadline—10 days from July 9 to submit a plan for equipping every ICE officer with the new Glocks. That’s a logistical sprint, not a marathon. Bureaucracy moving this fast? Color us skeptical.
A federal agent, speaking anonymously to Breitbart News, vouched for the memo’s legitimacy. No surprise there—whistleblowers often spill the beans when big changes hit. But the silence from DHS on why the P320 got the boot speaks volumes.
Lawsuits swirling around the Sig Sauer P320 are the elephant in the room. The memo doesn’t spell it out, but the timing suggests these legal battles pushed DHS to act. Smart move or knee-jerk reaction? Time will tell.
Glock 19 MOS Takes Center Stage
The Glock 19 MOS isn’t just a sidearm; it’s a statement. With its red dot sight and weapon light, it’s built for precision and adaptability—qualities ICE officers need in high-stakes encounters. Progressives might scoff, but tools like these keep agents safe.
ICE’s transition is slated for October 2025, per a federal agency source. That’s a tight window to replace every officer’s duty weapon. If delays hit, don’t be shocked—government timelines are more suggestion than scripture.
The memo’s urgency hints at deeper issues with the P320. Was it a design flaw or just bad press from the lawsuits? DHS isn’t saying, but the rush to Glock suggests they’re not taking chances.
Lawsuits Cast a Long Shadow
The Sig Sauer P320’s legal troubles aren’t new, but they’re rattling cages at DHS. Switching to Glock could be a preemptive strike to avoid more headlines—or worse, liability. Smart, but it’s a pricey fix for taxpayers.
ICE officers, meanwhile, are caught in the crossfire. They’re trained to rely on their gear, and a sudden swap could shake confidence. DHS better ensure training is top-notch to avoid hiccups.
The choice of the Glock 19 MOS is a nod to reliability. Glocks have a cult following among law enforcement for a reason—they work. Still, forcing a rapid switch feels like bureaucracy playing catch-up.
What’s Left Unsaid Matters
DHS’s silence on the P320’s specific flaws is deafening. If the lawsuits are baseless, why the rush to replace? Transparency would go a long way to quell speculation.
For now, ICE officers are gearing up for a major change. The Glock 19 MOS is a solid pick, but the transition’s success hinges on execution. Botch this, and DHS will have more than lawsuits to worry about.
Conservatives will cheer the focus on officer safety, but the lack of clarity stinks of government opacity. ICE deserves better than a rushed memo and a prayer. Let’s hope DHS gets this right—our agents’ lives depend on it.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Benjamin Clark
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://americandigest.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.