Dan McLaughlin of National Review Online shares his concerns about the U.S. solicitor general’s recent argument at the U.S. Supreme Court in a case involving January 6.
One thing about the argument really puzzled me: why Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar insisted upon distinguishing January 6 from other types of obstructive protests. I understand what, legally, she thought this would accomplish — but her approach runs the risk of being a disastrous misreading of the justices, and one that may have been driven more by the demands of her client than by a sound strategy for winning the case. …
… Here’s what surprised me in listening to the argument: By far Prelogar’s strongest rhetorical ground is to wrap herself in the plain language of (c)(2) – “it says what it says, and that’s the law, if you don’t like it, take that up with Congress” — and force her opponent to be the one arguing for an unwritten limitation on what the words mean. That’s a good place to be if you’re arguing before a textualist court, as this one is. It’s also a good place to be if you want to blunt concerns about prosecutorial overzealousness. … The law is the law is the law. …
… As she was pressed by the justices to dispel the appearance of an about-face or a Trump-only legal standard, she ended up undermining that argument by attempting to craft a standard with elements not found in the text, in order to insulate from Section 1512(c)(2) prosecutions the kinds of protests that the Biden administration might look upon with more favor. …
… So, what was Prelogar playing at? One might suspect that she was attempting to draw a distinction between the January 6 defendants and the people who have not been charged for the 2020 riots and other forms of left-wing civil disobedience ranging from interrupting congressional hearings to totally closing off access to the Portland federal courthouse.
The post Solicitor General Seems to Back a J6-Only Standard Before Supreme Court first appeared on John Locke Foundation.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Mitch Kokai
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.johnlocke.org and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.