An unwritten rule adopted by the Mississippi Real Estate Commission requires real estate salespeople live within an hour of their supervising broker, or roughly 50 miles, just so that broker can keep tabs on them.
But the Institute for Justice has written a letter challenging that standard, which essentially is a staff interpretation of a rule concerning those supervisory responsibilities and is not, actually, written down.
The issue is that with modern technology, brokers have options with a long list of ways of keeping tabs on sales representatives without have them in the same room.
A letter from the IJ to real estate commissioners Vicki Blackwell, Brian Gomillion, Anthony Jones, Joe Stedman and James Stroo explains, “Conditioning approval of licenses on the applicant’s proximity to their designated broker is unfair, irrational in the Zoom era, and unconstitutional.”
The legal team explained, “The 50-Mile Requirement Burdens the Right to Pursue an Occupation. For over a century, the Mississippi Supreme Court has held that ‘[t]he right to follow any of the common occupations of life is an inalienable right.’ Since then, the Mississippi Supreme Court has guarded that right zealously. For instance, it recently struck down irrational licensing restrictions that prevented anyone ever convicted of a felony from becoming a bail agent.”
That state tribunal found, “A person’s God-given, constitutional liberty to engage in a profession should not so easily be extinguished by the government.”
The letter suggested the “one-hour-drive requirement is unconstitutional for the same reason: it denies applicants their ‘inalienable’ right to pursue an occupation for no good reason. To be sure, IJ is not questioning the requirement that brokers supervise their licensees. But the commission has provided no rationale for requiring brokers to do so from within an hour’s drive.”
The IJ’s conclusion is that the requirement violates the state constitution.
The rule actually in on shaky ground, as it isn’t a formal rule, just a “staff interpretation.”
“We live in a digital age where geographical boundaries are becoming increasingly irrelevant, especially in professional settings,” explained Aritt Davis, of REAL Broker LLC in Pascagoula. “This rule not only limits the freedom of real estate professionals but also hinders the growth and dynamism of our firm and the overall industry. In an era where flexibility and connectivity are key, such a geographical restriction is not just outdated, it’s a significant financial and arbitrary impediment.”
Further, the letter explains the MREC applies the rule unevenly., rejecting applicants who are willing to travel to be supervised, or use Zoom, while approving others who clearly don’t meet that requirement.
“For over a century, the Mississippi Supreme Court has held that Mississippians have an ‘inalienable’ right to pursue the profession of their choice,” said IJ lawyer Michael Soyfer. “Yet, the commission’s one-hour-drive rule places an unnecessary stumbling block in the path of would-be real estate salespeople trying to do just that.”
Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].
SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!
The post Real estate regulators confronted about ‘secret’ residency rule appeared first on WND.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: WND Staff
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.wnd.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.