1. Why is the USA building a port for Gaza? Frank Gaffney and a colleague of Lord Pearson of the UK, David Wurmser. (Second video more to the point)
2. International effort to disrupt cybercrime moves into operational phase
(As you read this very important article on what one might think of as ‘strategic certainty’ on busting up crime rings and maybe individual criminals, please consider carefully how the definition of criminal is changing. Think in part of some of the early things said in the video above, and about for example, the ‘Online Harms’ bill of the Trudeau govt. along with C-6 and many others that concern what was always considered unalienable human rights.)
The Cybercrime Atlas, a massive undertaking that aims to disrupt cybercriminals across the globe, enters its operational phase in 2024, two years after organizers laid the groundwork at the RSA Conference.
At the time, the public-private collaboration was still in the proof-of-concept stage with one ambitious goal – to map out relationships between criminal groups, their infrastructure, supply chains and other dependencies, and to use this knowledge to break up the entire ecosystem.
The initiative officially launched at the World Economic Forum in July 2023 with founding members Banco Santander, Fortinet, Microsoft, and Paypal.
“One of the main questions was, is it actually possible, with companies stepping in to invest resources in this type of research? And it became very clear that yes, companies can work together, they are very eager to create this type of knowledge base and to be part of such processes,” Tal Goldstein, the WEF Centre for Cybersecurity’s head of strategy, told The Register.
Its members now include 20-plus law enforcement agencies, private-sector security companies and incident responders, financial institutions, NGOs, and academics.
Over the past year, the investigations group, which now has more than 20 members, meets weekly “to go over intelligence packages, and we’re working on profiling for threat actors,” said Derek Manky, chief security strategist and global VP of threat intelligence at Fortinet’s FortiGuard Labs.
The USA is still arresting people for protesting a stolen election in 2020. They have said they won’t stop till they have at least 2000 people in jail. This is pure Stalin. “Show me the man and I will tell you what he is guilty of.” And this is coordinated by the WEF. The Head of the WEF was interviewed in his home, where he had a bust of Vladimir Lenin on his bookshelf.
3. While this is not an example of how this technology was used, its a perfect illustration of how it will be used. Germany:
I wrote in February about the plans of Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD) to combat “right-wing extremism,” by re-purposing the regulatory state to restrict the speech, travel and economic activity of people with inconvenient opinions. She wants to use state resources to intimidate “those who mock the state,” and she has proposed legal innovations to interfere with the bank accounts and finances not only of those who break the law, but also of those who represent “a potential threat” and who exercise undue “social influence.” At the same press conference, Thomas Haldenwang, head of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, announced his intention to police the “thought and speech patterns” of the German people, lest uncomfortable ideas and words “become part of our language.” Separately, Green Family Minister Lisa Paus addressed the problem of “hate on the internet” that inconveniently “falls below the threshold of criminal liability.” Something must be done about those “enemies of democracy” who “know exactly what is protected by freedom of expression” and thereby manage to speak without breaking the law.
These statements proved so disturbing that they drew a highly unusual and critical response from state media broadcaster ZDF. Yesterday, even the New York Times chimed in with misgivings about the disturbing political turn Germany has taken. Somewhere in the midst of the energy crisis, the plummeting approval ratings of the Scholz government, the false Correctiv media scandal and the ensuing regime-sponsored demonstrations “against the right,” wide sectors of the German political establishment and their supporters have become so radicalised and deranged, as to inspire nervousness even among allies.
A story from 27 February illustrates how bad things have gotten. It involves a 16 year-old girl at the Richard-Wossidlo Gymnasium in Ribnitz-Damgarten (Mecklenburg-Vorpommern). She posted an AfD-friendly video featuring blue Smurfs to TikTok, in which she said that Germany was not just a place, but also her home. School officials got wind of the blasphemy and the principle, Jan-Dirk Zimmermann, called the police; subsequently, no less than three officers were dispatched to neutralise this unusual threat to the German democratic order. After first establishing that the girl’s social media posts were totally legal and broke no laws, they took her from her chemistry class and escorted her to a staff room, where they told her to refrain from making such posts in the future, “for her own protection.”
Please read the rest at Eugyppius’ Substack linked above
4. James O’Keefe manages to find more and more people who can’t tell who he is when he is wearing glasses. In fairness, people who are this far to the left likely never watched his hidden camera busts of communist agents like this guy. The Post Millennial link to the story
BREAKING INSIDE THE PENTAGON: Associate Director in the Office of the Secretary of Defense says, “Why not just have an open border?” “Tear down the wall.”
“I think we should repeal the Second Amendment and take the guns all away!” says Jason Beck, who has a classified security… pic.twitter.com/QSuXmgQAPz
— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) March 13, 2024
In a recent sexual assault case, The Supreme Court of Canada ruled it was “problematic” for a lower court judge to refer to the alleged victim as a “woman,” implying that the term that should have been used is “person with a vagina.”
Justice Sheilah Martin, nominated to the Court by woke champion Justin Trudeau in 2017, wrote in a decision published Friday that a trial judge’s use of the word “a woman” may “have been unfortunate and engendered confusion.”
According to The National Post, the involves a sexual assault allegation made by a woman against Charles Kruk. The victim alleges she was intoxicated and lost when Kruk took home with him in 2017 to call her family for help.
[…]
Martin does not specify why the word “woman” is confusing, but the next passage in her decision refers to the complainant as a “person with a vagina.” Notably, not one person in the entire case is identified as transgender, and the complainant is referred to throughout as a “she.”
INSANE. During a trial for a s*xual ass*ult case, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a female victim shouldn’t be referred to as a “woman”, rather a “person with a v*gina.”https://t.co/HCN44bspF3 https://t.co/bU9CGglocW
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) March 14, 2024
“Imposed Pseudo-reality”. Indeed.
Thank you all for checking out this site.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Eeyore
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://vladtepesblog.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.