Panel Declines to Endorse White House Plan for COVID-19 Booster for 16 and Older

In an eight-hour-long virtual meeting, doctors and experts alike testified on the effectiveness, or rather lack thereof, of the COVID-19 vaccinations.

The meeting was for the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), and the purpose of the meeting was to to “discuss Pfizer-BioNTech’s supplemental Biologics License Application for administration of a third dose, or “booster” dose, of the COVID-19 vaccine, Comirnaty, in individuals 16 years of age and older.”

GO AD-FREE, GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT, BECOME A PREMIUM USER

The influential advisory panel of experts with VRBPAC voted unanimously against endorsing the White House Plan to give Pfizer COVID-19 booster shots to everyone. The panel did, however, decide to endorse an extra vaccine dose for those who are “65 or older or run a high risk of severe disease.”

Included on the panel were Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials, Israel’s Health Ministry, vaccine experts, and Pfizer representatives. There were 18 members in all present on the virtual meeting.

It should be noted that the panel isn’t the final say on the matter, as the FDA is expected to “consider” their advice when making their final decision on whether to recommend yet another dose.

***FOLLOW US ON TELEGRAM***

The White House is seeking to offer booster shots to all because of the vaccine’s waning effectiveness over a short period of time, leading to a hefty increase of severe COVID patients being “fully vaccinated.”

Red Voice Media previously reported on an Israeli study that showed that natural immunity was 27 times more effective than the COVID-19 vaccine. Other studies have also shown that vaccination rate does not reduce the likelihood of transmitting the virus.

One of the most notable testimonies in this meeting was that of Dr. Fraiman, who told the panel that “vaccine hesitancy” is not due to being uninformed as the mainstream media suggests. Rather, he said, “The vaccine-hesitant I’ve met in the ER are more aware of the vaccine studies and more aware of their own COVID risks than the doctors do. For example, many of my nurses refuse the COVID vaccine despite seeing more COVID deaths and devastation than most people have.”

What’s more, he said, is that he doesn’t feel he can assure a 30-year-old nurse that getting the vaccine is safer than catching the virus for a healthy, young woman such as herself.

>>>FOLLOW US ON GAB<<<

Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, Steve Kirsch, said that the COVID-19 vaccines actually kill more people than they save. Patients, he said, are 71 times more likely to suffer a heart attack post-COVID-19 vaccine than with other vaccines. He said that the heart condition myocarditis affected 1 in 1,000 vaccinated people.

Kirsch also pointed to India’s state of Uttar Pradesh, where, as we previously reported, COVID-19 active cases have virtually disappeared thanks to the use of Ivermectin. He said that early treatments such as those used in the region are more effective than the vaccine, with less risk of side effects and even death.

The post Panel Declines to Endorse White House Plan for COVID-19 Booster for 16 and Older appeared first on Red Voice Media.

Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Leah Anaya


This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.redvoicemedia.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TeaPartyGear.com

A better search engine: DuckDuckGo.com.
Visit our Discussion Forum at Libertati.com.

Follow us: