Lawyer: I’d vote NOT GUILTY for Derek Chauvin in George Floyd trial & here’s why

Former police officer Derek Chauvin is facing several charges for his treatment of George Floyd. But attorney Andrew Branca explains WHAT must be proven in order for those charges to stand. Did Chauvin act reasonably, in the context of the entire situation? Were his actions directly responsible for Floyd’s passing, or could it be blamed on factors beyond Chauvin’s control? Branca also explains how the prosecutor committed misconduct serious enough for a potential appeal, how political tension makes it ‘impossible’ for a fair trial, why he would vote not guilty, and what sentence Chauvin is facing if the actual jury disagrees…

Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Jon Boldt


This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, http://www.glennbeck.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

USSANews.com
A better search engine: DuckDuckGo.com.
Visit our Discussion Forum at Libertati.com.

Follow us: