It begins: New Yorker files lawsuit, wants to marry their own adult child

MANHATTAN, NY– A New York parent who wants to reportedly marry their own adult child is suing to overturn laws barring the incestuous practice, calling it a matter of “individual autonomy.”

According to court documents, the parent is seeking to remain anonymous because their request is an “action that a large segment of society views as morally, socially, and biologically repugnant.”

In the Manhattan federal court claim filed on April 1st, the parent argued:

“Through the enduring bond of marriage, two persons, whatever relationship they might otherwise have with one another, can find a greater level of expression, intimacy and spirituality.”

The legal paperwork does not identify who the would-be newlyweds are, failing to identify their gender, ages, hometowns, or the nature of their relationship. The filing states:

“The proposed spouses are adults. The proposed spouses are biological parent and child. The proposed spouses are unable to procreate together.”

According to New York law, incest is a third-degree felony with a penalty of up to four years in prison. Incestuous marriages are also considered void and spouses are punished with a fine and up to six months in jail. 

A person is guilty of incest in the third degree when he or she marries or engages in sexual intercourse, oral sexual conduct or anal sexual conduct with a person they are knowingly related to such as an ancestor, descendant, brother or sister of either the whole or the half blood, uncle, aunt, nephew or niece.

The City Clerk’s Office explains that marriage licenses in the five boroughs require potential spouses to list their birth parents and attest there are “no legal impediments to the marriage.”

In 2014, a state appeals court unanimously approved a case involving a woman married to her mother’s half-brother, noting the genetic relationship was the equivalent of first cousins. Even that ruling cited “the almost universal horror” with which a parent-child marriage is viewed. 

Reportedly, the parent in the recent case said that they want to propose to their child, but recognize the “emotional harm” the child could sustain if they got married while the current laws are in effect.

The parent wants to walk down the aisle in New York City and is now asking a judge to declare the current laws unconstitutional and unenforceable in their case. The suit states that they parent and child regard themselves as a “PAACNP” couple,  “Parent and Adult Child Non-Procreationable” couple. The suit also states:

“Parent-and-adult-child couples for whom procreation is either virtually or literally impossible can aspire to the transcendent purposes of marriage and seek fulfillment in its highest meaning.”

The parent then claims that it would “diminish their humanity” if they were unable to tie the knot with the kid they conceived. The claimant also argues that the “enduring bond of marriage” would take the parent and child union to a “greater level of expressions, intimacy and spirituality.”

NYU Law Professor Sylvia Law said that there are known cases of parents who are separated from their children in infancy, only to reunite decades later and become romantic. She added:

“I don’t think there’s a big popular movement, but I do think as long as we’ve kept records, there have been cases. It’s an area where I think most people would say the government has a right to make the rules, even if they don’t apply to every situation.”

Manhattan family and matrimonial law attorney Eric Wrubel said:

“It’s never gonna fly. The closest you can come is Woody Allen and that wasn’t his daughter, it was an adopted child whom he never adopted and it still turns people’s stomachs.”

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Police chief goes viral, gets arrested after accusations that he lead a triple life – marriages, girlfriends and more

January 28th, 2021

STINNETT, TX – The police chief for the Stinnett Police Department, who hosts 21 years of law enforcement experience, has reportedly been arrested not long after accusations of him engaging in extramarital affairs started going viral on Facebook.

Stinnett Chief of Police Jason Collier was initially reported as having been placed on administrative leave, per a press release from city manager Durk Downs.

Not long afterward, he was arrested and then resigned.

While a relatively small police department, this police station has been getting quite the internet traffic after a post accusing Chief Collier of living a “double/triple life” started going viral.

Chief Collier’s newfound troubles stemmed from a post on Facebook by Cecily Steinmetz from January 26th. This woman proclaimed that she and Chief Collier were romantically involved, but she had allegedly found out that the police chief was not only married but was also courting another woman.

The January 26th post reads as follows:

“Chief Jason Collier is living a double/triple life. I was his girlfriend until yesterday. He lied to me and presented me with fake annulment documents when I found out he was married.”

“I also found out about a 2nd girlfriend, Kristi, last night. He has lied to us, our children, and asked us both to marry him. He is a poor representative of your town.”

“He would also visit me in Amarillo when he was on shift. We just returned from vacation in Taos on Sunday – meanwhile, his other GF was told he was on work assignment in Portland, OR.”

As seen in the above shared post, Steinmetz shared photos of herself and someone who appears to be Chief Collier – accompanied by a screenshot post by the police chief from September of 2020 where he was celebrating the anniversary of him and his wife.

Now initially Steinmetz thought it was just her entangled in this alleged sordid affair, but after her post began to pick up momentum, she was reached out to by another woman named Kristi Shaffer who alleged to have also been entangled with Chief Collier around the same time that Steinmetz was involved with the police chief.

What makes this entanglement so controversial is that Chief Collier is reportedly not only married – but married with four children.

During the social media storm and incessant sharing of the viral post, other women have cropped up alleging that they too had been involved in some sort of romantic endeavor with Chief Collier.

The police chief would allegedly romance these purported extramarital counterparts with adorations and promises of eventually getting married to them.

It would only take one day after Steinmetz’s post went viral that the city of Stinnett would take action and place Chief Collier on administrative leave pending an investigation.

According to the press release from city manager Durk Downs, the following was written:

“The city of Stinnett is aware of the current situation surrounding the Chief of Police Jason Collier. The city is taking this seriously and will be looking into any violations of city policy.

Chief Jason Collier has been placed on administrative leave while the city investigates possible violations of city employment policy. As per city policy, we will refrain from commenting on any personal issues of personnel in a public form.”

It’s unclear whether an allegation of adultery would fall under any violation of a code of conduct or ethics within Stinnett (or any police station, at that) – and while immoral, adultery isn’t illegal in the state of Texas.

There was allegedly a marriage annulment certificate that Steinmetz claimed was shared by Chief Collier with her when she initially found out about his wife, which Steinmetz further alleged was verified as being a false/doctored certificate.

If said accusation turns out to be true regarding the phony document, then there most certainly would be something within the code of conduct/ethics within the police department that could have lead to termination of Chief Collier – and even possible legal ramifications down the road under Texas’ forgery laws as well.

And that seems to be the case with Collier’s recent arrest. On January 28th, Texas Rangers arrested Collier under charges of tampering with a government record with the intent to defraud or harm. 

Texas Department of Public Safety Sgt. Cindy Barkley just so happened to point to the marriage annulment aspect of the recent scandal:

“The document was a fraudulent marriage annulment.”

Bail was set for Collier at $100,000.

Whatever the outcome of this debacle may result in, at the very least it should serve as a warning to would-be Casanovas donning the uniform while having the spouse and kids at home.

 Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

In an update to a previous report we brought to you at Law Enforcement Today, three additional Seattle Police Department officers are under investigation for having self admittedly been present in Washington, DC on January 6th. 

While these three officers haven’t been suspended like the two other Seattle Police officers, these three unnamed officers reportedly came forward after Office of Police Accountability Director Andrew Myerberg notified all SPD personnel to come forward if they merely attended the January 6th rally where a riotous group broke off from and stormed the Capitol Building. 

Here’s our previous report detailing the two officers that were suspended for their alleged attendance in Washington, DC from January 6th. 


SEATTLE, WA – According to Seattle Police Department officials, two officers within the SPD have been placed on leave after the two allegedly attended the D.C. protest/riot.

From what department officials say, investigators are trying to determine if: 

A) If the officers were even at the D.C. during the incident

B) If they attended, did they participate in any of the illegal activities that occurred 

C) If any of their alleged activities, legal or not, were in violation of SPD policies

Chief Adrian Diaz announced on January 8th that two of the department’s officers – who have not been identified by name – may have been present in D.C. on January 6th when the Capitol Building was breached. 

It’s unclear as to what led SPD officials to suspect that two officers were present during the protest/riot in the nation’s capitol, as it wasn’t clarified whether said suspicion was ascertained through possible video, photographic, or mere testimonial evidence. 

However, Seattle-based editor-at-large for Newsweek, Naveed Jamali, claimed that the two officers were a husband and wife and that one or both of them posted pictures to their personal social media accounts showcasing that they were present at the nation’s capitol. 

When speaking on the matter and internal investigation, Chief Diaz stated the following: 

“The Department fully supports all lawful expressions of First Amendment freedom of speech, but the violent mob and events that unfolded at the U.S. Capitol were unlawful and resulted in the death of another police officer.”

Andrew Myerberg, who serves as the director of the Office of Police Accountability, also commented on the matter, simply noting that there’s reason to believe two SPD officers were present in D.C. on January 6th and that the allegations are being looked into:

“At this point, we are aware of two current SPD officers who are believed to have attended the protests in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday.”

“We do not yet know the extent of their participation and will be determining this as we proceed through the case. We will also be investigating whether there were any other SPD employees who may have been involved.”

Myerberg continued from there, noting that at this time there’s general ambiguity as to whether merely being present at the protest alone, and not involved in any sort of criminal activity that transpired at the Capitol Building, could fall under violating SPD policy: 

“The fundamental question will be, ‘Is being present at the rally in and of itself a violation of department policy?’ And I just don’t know that yet. I think it really depends on what they did and what their role was in those events.”

This is an ongoing investigation. 

Please follow Law Enforcement Today as we gather further insight into this developing matter. 


Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!
Facebook Follow First

The post It begins: New Yorker files lawsuit, wants to marry their own adult child appeared first on Law Enforcement Today.

Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Jenna Curren

This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
A better search engine:
Visit our Discussion Forum at

Follow us: