Not So Supreme Court: Justice Clarence Thomas Issued Dissenting Opinion Regarding Court’s Decision in Election Fraud

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas issued a dissenting opinion regarding the high court’s decision not to take up a case that challenged Pennsylvania’s Nov. 3 election results.

The court on Feb. 22 announced that it won’t take up lawsuits challenging a Pennsylvania state court decision that relaxed ballot-integrity measures, including a move to extend the ballot-receipt deadline during the November election by three days amid the CCP virus pandemic. Former President Donald Trump and the state’s Republican Party urged the court to take up a review of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling.

“This is not a prescription for confidence,” Thomas wrote on Feb. 22, adding that “changing the rules in the middle of the game is bad enough.” Thomas, considered by many to be the most conservative justice, said the court should have granted a review.

“That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future,” Thomas wrote (pdf). “These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”

Thomas was joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch in dissenting.

“If state officials have the authority they have claimed, we need to make it clear. If not, we need to put an end to this practice now before the consequences become catastrophic,” Thomas, an appointee of former President George H.W. Bush, wrote.

Thomas also appeared to make a reference to allegations of fraud and irregularities during the Nov. 3 election.

“We are fortunate that many of the cases we have seen alleged only improper rule changes, not fraud,” he wrote. “But that observation provides only small comfort. An election free from strong evidence of systemic fraud is not alone sufficient for election confidence. Also important is the assurance that fraud will not go undetected.”…[   ]

The post Not So Supreme Court: Justice Clarence Thomas Issued Dissenting Opinion Regarding Court’s Decision in Election Fraud appeared first on NewsCetera.

Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Dan H


This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://newscetera.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.

Visit our Discussion Forum at Libertati.com.

Follow us:
USSA News | The Tea Party's Front Page
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com