Attorney Sidney Powell Reacts To The Latest Supreme Court Inaction, Cites Justice Thomas’ Scathing Dissent

( Exclusive) – As you’ve no doubt heard, the United States Supreme Court has made it crystal clear they have no intention of getting involved in election issues, even if the law demands they do.

In Pennsylvania, a rogue, unelected Secretary of State took election matters into her own hands and completely usurped the authority of the state’s General Assembly in doing so.

As prescribed by the US Constitution, election law is to be determined and governed by each state’s legislative bodies, not state executives and not activist judges.

Under the guise of the COVID-19 pandemic, Democrats like PA’s Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, massively expanded mail-in voting which resulted in millions of unsolicited ballots being sent out to “residents” on the state’s outdated and inaccurate voter rolls.

Of course, many that received ballots were legitimate residents and legal voters but that didn’t stop dead people and those no longer meeting residency requirements from receiving ballots and somehow voting.

The fact that Boockvar changed the state’s voting deadlines and “ballot curing” procedures should be enough to get a court to take the case questioning Pennsylvania’s incredibly suspicious and unlikely results.

However, the US Supreme Court, once again, refused to get involved.

On Monday morning the Court announced it would not be reviewing the cases involving allegations that the Pennsylvania election was mismanaged to the degree of violating the US Constitution.

The decision was not without dissent. Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas all dissented from the Court’s denial while Trump-nominated Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett sided with the liberal justices.

There were four cases involving Pennsylvania. Two of them were dismissed without dissent while the other two were dismissed with the dissent of Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch.

One of the cases dismissed was the Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Degraffenreid (formerly the now-resigned Boockvar) and Corman (formerly Scarnati) v. Pennsylvania Democratic Party.

Attorney Sidney Powell pointed out on her Telegram page that both of these cases were dismissed with Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas dissenting. Thomas said in his dissent, “These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”

It truly is inexplicable. Powell shared Thomas’ dissent on Techno Frog and added that “The inaction from the Supreme Court will only encourage more abuse.”

Clearly. If there are absolutely no consequences whatsoever for violating the US Constitution, Democrats will surely stop at nothing to ensure election victories from now until forever.

Shame on the US Supreme Court for refusing to do their jobs. There is nothing “moot” about these cases just because the election is over. A precedent must be set that would deter state executives from abusing their authority in the future.

Sadly, it doesn’t look like that’s going to happen.

Copyright 2021.

Join The Uprisinghref>

Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: josh

This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.

Visit our Discussion Forum at

Follow us:
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By :