The European Union is going deep with its plans to introduce digital IDs
across industries. Tying a form of digital ID to all products would
make the introduction of carbon social credit scores easier to
implement.
The concept of “carbon passports,” proposed as a measure to combat
climate change, has, for a while now, raised significant concerns
regarding civil liberties. These passports are designed to track an
individual’s carbon footprint, including travel, energy consumption, and
lifestyle choices. While their intention is to encourage
environmentally friendly behaviors, they present a substantial threat to
personal privacy by enabling continuous monitoring of personal
activities.
This intrusion into privacy is not the only issue; carbon passports
could potentially lead to discriminatory practices. Those in
lower-income brackets, who often have limited access to green
alternatives, might find themselves unfairly penalized. This system
risks exacerbating social inequalities by disproportionately affecting
those less financially equipped to make eco-friendly choices.
Furthermore, carbon passports could restrict movement and personal
autonomy. Limiting travel or certain activities based on carbon usage
might create a situation where only the wealthy, who can afford carbon
offsets or sustainable options, maintain their freedom. This scenario
paints a disturbing picture of environmental responsibility being
accessible only to those with financial means.
Another concern is the centralization of power in the hands of
entities controlling the carbon data. This centralization could lead to a
slippery slope where tools designed for climate control evolve into
instruments of more oppressive surveillance and control. The balance
between addressing environmental concerns and maintaining civil
liberties is delicate and crucial.
As part of the push towards carbon passports, a new idea – tying a
form of digital ID to all products is also being pushed. It makes the
introduction of carbon social credit scores easier to implement.
The European Union is going deep with its plans to introduce digital
IDs (in this case, “digital product passports, DDPs”) across industries.
DDPs specifically refer to apparel, accessories and electronics.
Brands are now starting to work on
integrating the tech – that the European Commission says is necessary
for the greater good of citizens, such as meeting “sustainability goals”
– the so-called green deal, carbon emissions, all the things – and then
there’s access to services and contactless payment.
Critics, on the other hand, say it’s simply yet another way to abuse
consumers by harvesting even more of their data. The opponents’ fears
appear to rely on solid facts since some of the data collected thanks to
the EU’s proposed scheme will profile people based on their behavior,
preferences, and even the value of their “resale profile.”
The deadline mentioned is as early as 2026 – that’s how soon brands
would have to incorporate digital passports into their products.
And, don’t expect any resistance from brands. Reports are saying that
they are working hard to meet the deadline of meeting what is referred
to as the European Commission’s “real-world uses for digital
identities.”
On the side of the fashion industry, there will be the need to let
the EU know – no longer voluntarily – about how they manufacture items,
organize their supply chains, and the materials used.
Well, don’t expect brands to only implement the tech to make the EU
feel good about itself. “Brands currently testing the technology are
figuring out ways for it to collect customer data and add perks beyond
the point of purchase,” writes Vogue Business.
Already trying to go a step above linking physical items with digital
identity – as is the case with QR and NFC – and meet EU goals are the
likes of Balenciaga, RealReal, and Boss, the article mentions.
And unlike that “old tech” that was there mostly to facilitate and
protect transactions, manufacturers and customers, Mojito CEO Raakhee
Miller had this interesting take on what’s referred to as the upcoming,
“physical first” method: it “not only enhances the product’s value,”
said Miller, “but also deepens consumer engagement.”
So, how deeply does the EU – and brands following its diktat – want
to “engage” customers, other than people handing over money for a
product they buy? This is where what’s basically data harvesting and
mining comes into play, even if it is explained in fancy (and
unsurprisingly, equally meaningless) terms like “phygital goods” and
“metaverse approach.”
But, so to speak, the proof is in the word salad: the point is to
have services and use cases “more anchored in client needs.” And
clearly, to know what those needs are, one must first better know the
client. Meaning, beyond what the client is currently comfortable sharing
with multinational conglomerates.
Can’t we all just buy what we want, and move along? Please?
Not so fast, the EU says, and people like Vestiaire Collective VP of
Partnerships Laura Escure explain it by no less than what might seem to
many as basically questioning the customers’ cognitive abilities.
“The barriers around Web3 were not helping consumers to think thoroughly about luxury,” Escure is quoted.
And did you know that if you dish out a lot of money on a luxury
product, there’s a whole “story” behind it – beside the one in your bank
statement? That’s how Aura Blockchain Consortium CEO Romain Carrere
wants you to think about the situation.
“We believe in a future where every customer feels connected to the
story behind their products, and the DPP is the key to unlocking that
narrative. It’s not just a digital passport, it’s a journey of trust and
empowerment for every consumer,” said Carrere.
But mostly, it would seem, it’s a narrative. There to empower itself, and those in positions of power, rather than the customer.
Back in EU’s bureaucracy, the digital product passport proposals
first saw the light of day in the spring of 2022, naturally, as
“sustainability” enhancing mechanisms related to products, and about a
year later, this was officially presented on the European Commission
website as a way to share key information about a product.
The information would be shared “across all the relevant economic
actors,” a press release said in May 2023. Things are happening in this
space under the Proposal for Ecodesign for Sustainable Products
Regulation (ESPR).
The EU claims its goals are to boost what it calls circular economy,
material and energy efficiency, and extend product lifetimes, as well as
the way waste from those products is eventually handled.
The bloc also declares some grand ambitions here – like creating new
business opportunities – “based on improved data access,” though.
And the EU is not above putting down consumers either, while at once
working to elevate the level of data scrounged off of them. The DDP
scheme, the Commission says, will “help consumers in making sustainable
choices.”
And, for now – “allow authorities to verify compliance with legal obligations.”
Reprinted with permission from Reclaim The Net.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Planet Today
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.planet-today.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.