Unbelievable. Instead of summarily ousting a thoroughly corrupt, compromised District Attorney, she;s given a smorgasbord of options.
Fight or fuck. But she can;t do both.
Judge McAfee worked for Fani Willis and donated to her campaign AND has now ruled that Fani can keep prosecuting Trump but only if she removes her lover Nathan Wade off the case!
Judge McAfee should have recused himself in the first place because of his obvious bias.
Fani… pic.twitter.com/o47THElYkN
— Marjorie Taylor Greene (@mtgreenee) March 15, 2024
Judge McAfee who worked for her, donated to her campaign, and voted for her has ruled that Fani Willis can continue her racketeering case against Trump.

Corruption at its best!Off to the Georgia appellate court!
— Bernard B. Kerik (@BernardKerik) March 15, 2024
Judge McAfee’s ruling us illogical and inconsistent even within the 4 corners of the judgment itself.
1) There is no evidence of any reimbursement, but Willis’ testimony was not “inherently unbelievable”.
2) No conflict even when Willis “repeatedly” made bad choices, and… pic.twitter.com/vKBwiaq4CN
— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) March 15, 2024
Judge Says Fani Willis Must Ditch Nathan Wade Or Step Aside From Trump Case
By: Katelynn Richardson, Daily Caller, March 15, 2024:
A judge declined Friday to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis Friday from the case against former President Donald Trump.
Judge Scott McAfee found that the defendants had “failed to meet their burden of proving that the District Attorney acquired an actual conflict of interest in this case through her personal relationship and recurring travels with her lead prosecutor.” However, he said that the record “highlights a significant appearance of impropriety that infects the current structure of the prosecution team,” stating that Nathan Wade must either withdraw or Willis and her whole office can choose to step aside to solve the problem.
McAfee wrote that disqualifying Willis was not necessary “when a less drastic and sufficiently remedial option is available.”
“The Court therefore concludes that the prosecution of this case cannot proceed until the State selects one of two options,” he wrote. “The District Attorney may choose to step aside, along with the whole of her office, and refer the prosecution to the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council for reassignment. See O.C.G.A. § 15-18-5. Alternatively, SADA Wade can withdraw, allowing the District Attorney, the Defendants, and the public to move forward without his presence or remuneration distracting from and potentially compromising the merits of this case.”
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Pamela Geller
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://gellerreport.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.