NRA Responds to NASCAR’s New Gun Ad Policy

When private companies start taking
political stances, the results are rarely good for anyone involved. Now, by
refusing to air any more advertisements for certain firearms, NASCAR may have
become the latest organization to alienate a large swath of their fanbase.

NASCAR’s advertising vendor,
National Event Publications, sent out an email to gun companies explaining
NASCAR was introducing new advertising rules. The email read, “We
just heard from NASCAR on a number of gun related ads and unfortunately, due to
a gradual shift in NASCAR’s position on guns, these ads must be edited/changed
— especially those that are depicted as assault-style rifles/sniper rifles.
NASCAR is still open to some of the less controversial gun accessories,
concealed carry, or classes.”

From a business perspective, it
makes zero sense for NASCAR to take a political stance against firearms. The
overlap between fans of NASCAR and fans of the Second Amendment is well over
50%. Even if just half of NASCAR fans end up taking issues with the
organization’s decision to discontinue many firearm and firearm-related
advertisements then it will still amount to a horrible business decision on
NASCAR’s part.

While news of NASCAR’s decision to
ban certain gun advertisements hasn’t gained enough widespread attention yet to
really know how the organization’s fanbase will respond, some of NASCAR’s
advertisers are already making their displeasure known. David Dolbee, the
general manager for K-Var Corp – a firearms distributor that recently had one
of their advertisements rejected by NASCAR, responded by saying, “They’ve
got the drivers shooting off blanks in the winner’s circle. It doesn’t make any

Dolbee went on to say, “This
is a colossal mistake. Do they not understand their own base? They are a
sporting organization trying to take sides on a political issue. That never
goes well for any company.”

NASCAR’s advertisers weren’t the
only ones to take issue with the organization’s new stance on firearm
advertisements, though. In an online post, the NRA responded to the decision by
saying, “It is not clear if NASCAR is now taking an official position in
opposition to semi-automatic rifles —with the AR-15 variants often referred to
as America’s Rifle — and bolt action rifles. What does seem clear, however, is
that NASCAR doesn’t want to see such things advertised in its official
publication in the future: a decision that could easily alienate a great many
of its most ardent fans.”

While NASCAR’s decision as a
private organization to take a stance on the gun control debate is not in and
of itself a direct threat to Second Amendment rights, it does mark another
shift in the cultural war that gun rights supporters should find very
concerning. Right now, those in favor of increased gun control are starting to
win the war of public perception.

NASCAR certainly isn’t the first
company in recent months to take an anti-gun stance, and the number of
companies now siding with the gun control movement is evidence that the
movement’s public pressure campaign against these companies is working.

If they can convince NASCAR, after
all – a company that caters to a pro-Second Amendment, suburban fanbase – then
there’s no telling what company they might be able to convince next to join the
anti-gun movement.

Visit the USSA News store!
Click this link for the original source of this article.

This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact the administrator by using the contact form located in the top-left menu. Your request will be immediately honored. Please visit for more terrific, conservative content. The owner of this website may be paid to recommend American Bullion. The content of this website, including the positive review of American Bullion, the negative review of its competitors, and any other information may not be independent or neutral.