BDS Is Dangerous Because It Poisons the Next Generation of Leaders

A BDS demonstration outside the School of Oriental and African Studies in London in 2017. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

JNS.orgNot many Israelis are aware of how successful the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement has become, particularly among liberals.

One survey released in February suggested that one in five Americans approved of BDS as a way of opposing Israeli policy vis-à-vis the Palestinians. A December 2018 University of Maryland poll of a much larger sample put the support at 40 percent.

In 2016, 46 percent of Democrats in the United States said their sympathies aligned with Israel, compared with 29 percent who sympathized with the Palestinians. In one 2018 poll, only 27 percent of Democrats supported Israel, compared with 25 percent for the Palestinians. That’s a 20 percent drop in support for Israel in just two years.

Much of today’s European antisemitism comes from liberals. A study conducted in 2012 by the German-based Friederich Ebert Stiftung Foundation showed that 63 percent of Poles and 48 percent of Germans think that “Israel is waging a war of extermination against the Palestinians,” along with 42 percent in Britain, 41 percent in Hungary, and 38 percent in Italy.

According to a survey by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, 48 percent of the European Jews interviewed have heard or read charges that “Israelis behave like Nazis toward the Palestinians.”

Younger liberals, perhaps especially young people of color, are the engines of rising discontent with reflexively pro-Israel policy. They often struggle to understand, much less to embrace, the way older liberals see Israel.

Here are three reason for the success of BDS:

First, BDS successfully allied itself with Western leftist causes by portraying Israel as a white, apartheid, racist, colonialist state engaged in the ethnic cleansing of its brown indigenous Arab population.

Second, Israel failed to recognize the large demographic, cultural, and ideological shift that has taken place in the West and adjust its actions, narrative, and policies to fit the new reality.

Third, Israel is not fighting the cultural and media war of delegitimization being waged by the Muslim Brotherhood and Israel’s enemies. Meanwhile, Israel is spending its time and resources in promoting unnecessary laws to prevent economic boycotts and sanctions that have not yet materialized.

BDS’s official objective is to mobilize international economic and political pressure on Israel, in solidarity with the Palestinians. Its campaign methods are copied from the struggle against the apartheid regime in South Africa, and focus on mainstreaming and popularizing its idea of Israel as a white, colonialist, apartheid, racist, and genocidal state.

Israel and its supporters have been successful in passing and obtaining laws, motions, and courts decisions against economic boycotts and sanctions. However, for BDS, boycotts and sanctions are long-term goals. In the short term, public opinion is what matters to the organization.

In the United States, 26 states have passed anti-BDS laws. The Republican-led Senate approved a federal anti-BDS bill in February that allows state and local governments to break ties with companies that boycott Israel, and the House passed a weaker version condemning BDS.

Unfortunately, such laws is not productive on the ground against BDS, because, for now, BDS is not spending much time lobbying governments, parliaments, companies, and universities to boycott or sanction Israel, or to sever relations.

Indeed, to some extent the responses of the United States and Israel to BDS, such as Israel refusing entry visas to BDS activists, or the legislative initiatives in the US, serve to strengthen the BDS narrative that Israel is an oppressive state.

BDS poses a threat to Israel not because it is causing Israel political or financial damage, but because it is shifting the opinions of the next generation of leaders in America and Europe, those now studying in universities. Israel needs to update its policies and narratives accordingly — and immediately.

Tesfazion Gerhelase is an Eritrean British citizen, a Tigrigna nationalist, and Zionist. He is the founder of Agaiazian Media and Education Center, which is dedicated to fighting antisemitism and the delegitimization of Israel.

Visit the USSA News store!
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Tesfazion Gerhelase / JNS.org


This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.algemeiner.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact the USSANews.com administrator by using the contact form located in the top-left menu. Your request will be immediately honored. Please visit https://www.algemeiner.com for more terrific, conservative content. The owner of this website may be paid to recommend American Bullion. The content of this website, including the positive review of American Bullion, the negative review of its competitors, and any other information may not be independent or neutral.

USSANews.com