Trump Administration Moves to End Asylum Protections for Central Americans

 

On Monday, the Trump Administration took action to end asylum protections for most Central American migrants.

According to a new rule published in the Federal Register , asylum seekers who pass through another country first will be ineligible for asylum at the U.S. southern border. The rule, expected to go into effect Tuesday, also applies to children who have crossed the border alone.

There are some exceptions: If someone has been trafficked, if the country the migrant passed through did not sign one of the major international treaties that govern how refugees are managed (though most Western countries have signed them) or if an asylum-seeker sought protection in a country but was denied, then a migrant could still apply for U.S. asylum.

The change reverses decades of ineffective policy that allows migrants to asylum shop.

Attorney General Bill Barr said of the change, “This rule will decrease forum shopping by economic migrants and those who seek to exploit our asylum system to obtain entry to the United States.”

As usual, the policy is expected to be challenged in court.

The policy is almost certain to face a legal challenge. U.S. law allows refugees to request asylum when they arrive at the U.S. regardless of how they did so, but there is an exception for those who have come through a country considered to be “safe.” But the Immigration and Nationality Act, which governs asylum law, is vague on how a country is determined “safe”; it says “pursuant to a bilateral or multilateral agreement.”

Right now, the U.S. has such an agreement, known as a “safe third country,” only with Canada. Under a recent agreement with Mexico, Central American countries were considering a regional compact on the issue, but nothing has been decided. Guatemalan officials were expected in Washington on Monday, but apparently a meeting between Trump and Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales was canceled amid a court challenge in Guatemala over whether the country could agree to a safe third with the U.S.

The ACLU has already chimed in to say the policy change is illegal. “The rule, if upheld, would effectively eliminate asylum for those at the southern border,” American Civil Liberties Union attorney Lee Gelernt said. “But it is patently illegal.”

The purpose of the change is to address the gap between passing the initial, cursory interview and getting denied upon more thorough consideration.  Since the courts have an 800,000 case backup, migrants wait years inside the U.S. border waiting to finish the process.

Image from Getty Images

Visit the USSA News store!
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Liz Sheld


This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://amgreatness.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact the USSANews.com administrator by using the contact form located in the top-left menu. Your request will be immediately honored. Please visit https://amgreatness.com for more terrific, conservative content. The owner of this website may be paid to recommend American Bullion. The content of this website, including the positive review of American Bullion, the negative review of its competitors, and any other information may not be independent or neutral.

USSANews.com USSANews.com