Group Says Newly Released Emails Show ‘Ethical Mess’ Among Top Echelon FBI Officials

WASHINGTON—Former FBI Director James Comey was fired in May 2017 just a few hours after the bureau’s top leadership drafted a letter to Congress that “muddled” his congressional testimony the week before.

The testimony concerned Huma Abedin’s use of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unsecured private email system, according to the non-profit government watchdog Judicial Watch.

President Donald Trump terminated Comey May 9, 2017, the same day the Senate Judiciary Committee received the letter concerning his May 3 testimony claiming Abedin made a “regular practice” of forwarding “hundreds and thousands” of emails from the Clinton system to her husband’s laptop computer.

Abedin’s husband is former Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY), who the same month in 2017 pleaded guilty to sending obscene photos to a minor. He was released from prison earlier this year.

“Director Comey spoke of hundreds and thousands of emails being forwarded from Ms. Abedin to Mr. Weiner’s laptop computer,” wrote FBI Assistant Director Gregory Bower in the letter to the committee.

Bower said 49,000 emails were forwarded but only “a small number a result of manual forwarding” by Abedin to Weiner. A dozen of the emails contained classified government information, he said.

Trump fired Comey for making “serious mistakes” in the FBI investigation of Clinton’s use of the unsecured private email instead of a government system to conduct official U.S. diplomatic business from 2009 to 2013, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Judicial Watch said Thursday it received 345 pages of internal FBI documents, including an email thread initiated at 6:34 a.m. by bureau attorney Lisa Page to multiple high-ranking bureau executives concerning Comey’s inaccurate congressional testimony.

“After a flurry of emails, by 8:56 a.m. Comey’s chief of staff, Jim Rybicki, sent the group a draft letter for Congress, saying, ‘Below is a draft that has been reviewed by the Director. Please let me know your thoughts,’” Judicial Watch said in releasing the document.

“At 2:02PM, Asst. Director for Congressional Affairs, Greg Brower, asked his colleagues to review the latest iteration of the draft letter to the Senate,” Judicial Watch continued. The final version of the letter was sent shortly thereafter.

The emails were among 13,000 pages of records ordered released to the watchdog group by U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton in a lawsuit filed after DOJ failed to respond to a Dec. 4, 2017, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

The documents released by Judicial Watch also included a March 24, 2017, email from New York Times Reporter Michael Schmidt to then-FBI Assistant Director for Public Affairs Michael Kortan.

Schmidt provided Kortan multiple details about an upcoming story written by three of his newsroom colleagues, but asked no questions of the FBI executive.

And an April 10, 2017, email from Page to top FBI colleagues described an advance look being given them by the New York Times to an upcoming story.

A third thread of emails released by Judicial Watch was a spat between then-lovers Page and former FBI counter-intelligence agent Peter Strzok, who managed the Clinton email probe, concerning a Judicial Watch revelation:

Page: “Are you serious, dude? I sent to [redacted]. So I’ve committed some grave sin for not including you on this? My apologies, DAD Strzok, sir.”

Strzok: “You know what? Take a step back and look at this… And stop with the DAD Sir bullsh*t. That is not the point and you know it.”

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said “these new Page-Strzok emails show the Obama FBI to be a mess both professionally and ethically.”


Visit the USSA News store!
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Mark Tapscott

This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact the administrator by using the contact form located in the top-left menu. Your request will be immediately honored. Please visit for more terrific, conservative content. The owner of this website may be paid to recommend American Bullion. The content of this website, including the positive review of American Bullion, the negative review of its competitors, and any other information may not be independent or neutral.