Shortly before Attorney General William Barr held a press conference to introduce the report from Special Counsel Robert Mueller, left-wing media pundits and politicians decried the conference happening before the report was released.
In her rush to capitalize on the moment, 2020 presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said Barr was acting as if he were President Donald Trump’s “personal attorney.”
“It’s a disgrace to see an Attorney General acting as if he’s the personal attorney and publicist for the President of the United States,” Warren tweeted.
Warren’s comment would carry more weight if she had also found it a “disgrace” that former Attorney General Eric Holder called himself then-President Barack Obama’s “wingman.”
“I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy. So, we’ll see,” Holder said on the Tom Joyner radio show in response to a question about him leaving the administration.
That interview took place in April 2013. Warren was elected in 2012 and assumed office in January 2013. A quick Twitter search finds no comment from Warren the day of or day after regarding the Politico article containing Holder’s comment.
In fact, a search of her Twitter account reveals she only tweeted twice about the former attorney general — both tweets contained praise.
Was Holder’s “wingman” statement not evidence of him “acting as if he’s the personal attorney and publicist for the President of the United States,” as Warren said of Barr?
The difference, obviously, is the party of the president.
They hypocrisy was noticed by Twitter user “Craige Schmuckatelli,” who asked Warren to “supply a link to your criticism of Holder saying that he was Obama’s ‘wingman.’”
Please supply a link to your criticism of Holder saying that he was Obama’s “wingman”. https://t.co/zEg3iAbxbO
— Craigé Schmuckatelli (@CraigR3521) April 19, 2019
Warren isn’t the only Democrat (or politician of any party, to be fair) with this problem. Another recent example comes from Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), who also on Thursday said he was “deeply troubled by reports that the [White House] is being briefed on the Mueller report AHEAD of its release.”
But in 1998, when Bill Clinton — a Democrat — was president, Nadler whined that the White House wasn’t given an investigatory report before it was released because it prevented his preferred commander-in-chief from creating a response.
“What is at issue here this morning is not his conduct but the fairness of the resolution before us, which is manifestly and grossly unfair,” Nadler said of Ken Starr’s report in 1998. “It is manifestly unfair because it denies the President the privilege we have given to every other person accused, as the gentleman from Michigan stated, the ability to see the accusation before it is released publicly so he can prepare a response.”
Thankfully we have the Internet, where no one’s hypocrisy can remain hidden. Politicians and pundits show who they really are in their responses to similar events under presidents from different parties. Obama telling then Russian President Dmitri Medvedev he would have “more flexibility” to negotiate after the 2012 election received barely a whiff from the mainstream media. Had Trump said the same thing to current Russian President Vladimir Putin, it would be impeachable evidence of collusion.
Visit the USSA News store!
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Conservative Fighters
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, http://conservativefighters.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact the USSANews.com administrator by using the contact form located in the top-left menu. Your request will be immediately honored. Please visit http://conservativefighters.com for more terrific, conservative content. The owner of this website may be paid to recommend American Bullion. The content of this website, including the positive review of American Bullion, the negative review of its competitors, and any other information may not be independent or neutral.