Consider the case of Sajjad Karim – a Conservative MEP who opposes leaving the EU and supports a second referendum. He is reported to be top of the Party’s list in the north-west region. So those who want to back the Tories have no choice, if they are supporters of Brexit, but to vote for him if the Euro-elections take place.
And here’s the thing: Party members have had no say in Karim’s place on the ticket. Indeed, they have had no say in his selection as a Conservative candidate at all. He has simply been imposed on Party members in the north-west by CCHQ, whether they like him or not.
Now let’s think more widely – and rebut any suggestion of pro-Brexit bias on this pro-Brexit site. Exactly the same consideration is set to apply in the South-East region, in relation to our columnist Daniel Hannan, if you are a Tory opponent of Brexit.
In some places, Conservative voters and members face both problems at once. In London, you might want to support pro-Brexit Syed Kamall but oppose anti-Brexit Charles Tannock. Or support anti-Brexit Charles Tannock and pro-Brexit Syed Kamall. You look to have no choice either way. Get one and get both. Even if you don’t want one of them (or either).
Perhaps CCHQ could get heavy, and deselect those who oppose the Party line. But think about the implications, were the principle to be applied to other elections. Would you really want Brandon Lewis – Theresa May, in effect – deciding who your local Conservative Parliamentary candidate is?
In any case, whose Party is it anyway? (As this site likes to ask.) The Conservative Party is essentially an alliance of local Associations that exist to support the Party in Parliament, and to represent the Tory cause in their local area.
It follows that they should select their candidates – be these for the local council, Parliament, or European Parliamentary elections forced on us all, inter alia, by the Prime Minister’s unwillingness to see Britain leave the EU on the date that she promised over a hundred times.
CCHQ will protest that there isn’t the time to arrange hustings for candidates. Maybe so. But there will none the less be a smack of rotten boroughs and Old Sarum about the imposition of Karim, if it happens – and of all the other potential candidates, too.
The peasants must patiently await the appointment of those that the barons have chosen to speak and vote on their behalf. The former should touch their caps, tug their forelocks – and be duly grateful.
This site not yet offered a view on whether to participate at in the European elections. But having candidates forced on Party members without a say – and with whose views they may disagree – is certainly not an incentive to vote.
Visit the USSA News store!
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Paul Goodman
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, http://www.conservativehome.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact the USSANews.com administrator by using the contact form located in the top-left menu. Your request will be immediately honored. Please visit http://www.conservativehome.com for more terrific, conservative content. The owner of this website may be paid to recommend American Bullion. The content of this website, including the positive review of American Bullion, the negative review of its competitors, and any other information may not be independent or neutral.