Ketanji Brown Jackson’s excuse for why grade school LGBTQ indoctrination is constitutional is almost too silly for words

The left claims to be the party all about choices, which is pretty rich considering the lack of choices they enforce on the rest of the world. This is especially true when it comes to education, as they believe school choice is evil. So, while parents are forced to either send their kids to failing public schools or pay the equivalent of their mortgage to a private school, there really is no choice for many people, as over half of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. Nonetheless, public schools were never intended to become indoctrination camps for the left, and someone should really inform the Dems that.

A group of concerned and religiously diverse parents has brought a court case forward to the Supreme Court after the board of education claimed they had no right to opt out of LGBT indoctrination, as the district believes they consented to this the moment they enrolled in public schools.

Similarly, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has a similar foolish take.

I am just curious, do you think Jackson would have a similar take had the district mandated bible courses? Because I think the answer to that is pretty clear.

The fact that this is the same justice who cannot tell you what a woman is, believes she’s competent enough to demand what kids learn in schools tells you all you need to know.

According to The Post Millennial:

The parents sued the school after the board removed their ability to opt their children out of the readings. They argue that requiring their young children “to participate in instruction contrary to their parents’ religious convictions violated the Free Exercise Clause.”

The board had stated in March 2023 that a notification would go out to parents before such a book is read to the students and parents could opt their children out, but reversed course the following day, stating that in the 2023-24 shcool year, “no further notice would be provided and no opt-outs tolerated as to the storybooks.”

You don’t have to be a legal expert to understand this is blatantly unconstitutional.

The petition to the Supreme Court cited a lower court’s ruling on the matter, “that parents essentially surrender their right to direct the religious upbringing of their children by sending them to public schools,” which “contradicts centuries of our history and traditions. Those traditions uphold what the decision below tears down: parents’ right to protect their children’s innocence and direct their religious upbringing.”

According to SCOTUSBLOG, Justice Sonia Sotomayor had a similar asinine position.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor echoed Kagan’s concerns about the potentially broad scope of the parents’ position, noting that there have also been objections to “biographical material about women who have been recognized for achievement outside their home,” as well as books featuring divorce, interfaith marriage, and immodest dress. Where, she queried, will the parents draw the line beyond requiring the school to inform them of the curriculum and then allow them to opt out?

In other words, she believes parents should have zero input in their students’ education, despite them funding it through property taxes. And to say the left is the party against parental rights would be an understatement.

So not only is the left the party against school choice and the party against parental rights, but they demand your child learn things contrary to your religious beliefs and then find the nerve to claim you had a “choice.” You really cannot make that insanity up.

Nonetheless, given that our founders found religious freedom to be so important, they made it the first amendment, SCOTUS is likely to side with the parents, according to SCOTUSBLOG.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday was sympathetic to a group of Maryland parents who want to be able to opt their elementary-school-aged children out of instruction that includes LGBTQ+ themes. The parents argued that the local school board’s refusal to give them that choice violates their religious beliefs and therefore their constitutional right to freely exercise their religion. During nearly two-and-a-half hours of oral argument, a majority of the justices seemed to agree with them, with several justices questioning whether there would even be any harm to simply allowing the parents to excuse their children from the instruction.

Someone should really inform the left that you can teach kids to be compassionate and respectful to all people, despite their insignificant preferences, without demanding they go against their conscience. That being said, both Jackson and Sotomayor are total clowns and have proven they couldn’t care less about being legally, logically, and constitutionally correct, if it’s at the expense of being politically correct. And there is no better representation of the left than that.

– YouTube

www.youtube.com