The Trump administration’s press team has established a hardline policy that’s sending shockwaves through media circles. Karoline Leavitt confirmed this stance to a New York Times reporter, stating bluntly that journalists who display preferred pronouns in their communications “clearly do not care about biological reality or truth.” Could this approach spread to other Republican-led offices or institutions?
Trump Administration Takes Firm Stance Against Pronoun Usage
The Trump administration has implemented a clear policy of not responding to reporters who display preferred pronouns in their email signatures. Karoline Leavitt, Trump’s press secretary, confirmed this approach to a New York Times reporter, creating immediate controversy in media circles.
Senior adviser Katie Miller reinforced this position with a definitive statement that has circulated widely among journalists. “As a matter of policy, I don’t respond to people who use pronouns in their signatures, as it shows they ignore scientific realities and therefore ignore facts,” Miller explained.
It is official White House policy to IGNORE reporters’ emails with pronouns in the signature
“I don’t respond to people who use pronouns in their signatures as it shows they ignore scientific realities and therefore ignore facts.” – @PressSec Karoline Leavitt
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) April 9, 2025
Policy Tested and Confirmed by Journalists
The administration’s policy was put to the test by Matt Berg, a correspondent at Crooked Media, who deliberately included pronouns in communications with the press office. Berg’s experiment confirmed the policy’s enforcement, as he received no response to his inquiries when pronouns were present in his signature.
Berg expressed disbelief at what he views as misplaced priorities from an administration responsible for providing accurate information to the public. His criticism reflects broader concerns among media professionals about potential barriers to accessing official statements and facts necessary for comprehensive reporting.
‘Trump press secretary doesn’t engage with reporters using pronouns in emails, says they deny reality’
Fact Check: True. https://t.co/fcbwImK9SH
— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) April 9, 2025
Media Organizations and Free Press Advocates Respond
The New York Times issued a statement critiquing the administration’s approach as “baffling” and potentially harmful to press freedoms. A Times spokesperson emphasized that “Evading tough questions certainly runs counter to transparent engagement with free and independent press reporting,” highlighting institutional concerns about the policy’s implications.
Conservative media figures and supporters have rallied behind the administration’s stance, viewing it as a necessary pushback against progressive ideology. Many see the policy as affirming traditional values and biological distinctions that form the foundation of their worldview.
The clash represents a fundamental disagreement about journalism’s relationship with evolving social norms. While some journalists view pronoun inclusion as a basic courtesy reflecting societal progress, the Trump administration characterizes it as evidence of bias that undermines credibility.
This policy arrives amid broader cultural debates about gender identity that have intensified during recent election cycles. Both supporters and critics recognize that beyond practical implications for media access, the stance serves as a powerful signal to voters about where the administration stands on these divisive social issues.
Press freedom organizations have raised concerns about selective engagement with media based on cultural or political markers. The precedent could potentially influence how future administrations interact with journalists, creating inconsistent access to government information based on factors unrelated to reporting quality or institutional reputation.
Sources:
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Editorial Team
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.rightwinginsider.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
