Now you might be wondering why I’m writing on a topic I generally don’t cover and haven’t written on in (checks notes) almost nine years, a good start would be to explain why choose not to. For starters, as issues go abortion simply is not at the top of my list and there are only so many hours in the day. More significantly, so much has been said and people’s opinions are so strong on this topic that there is nothing significant I can contribute to the conversation. So it takes a unique angle for me to weigh in,
To drop a few brief points before I get to mine, Republicans have to go on the attack with this issue. No, abortion isn’t #1 with voters, but they can be surgical in outreach to expose The Radical Left’s extremism on this issue. I’ve only dedicated three of my now over 900 blog posts (yes, really!) to this topic. To recap, first off I extend a hand to the Lefties for some honest dialog on The Science (TM):
Here is How the Pro-Choice Crowd Can Win the Debate Once and for All… Or Forever Shut Up
I also asked where the Animal Rights Activists were regarding the suffering of living animals?
Where Are the Animal Rights Activists on the Planned Parenthood Videos?
And finally, given its attachment to The Right to life March, I weighed in on The Covington Crucifixion:
Top Ten Disturbing Takeaways from the Covington Crucifiction
Not mine, but this post sparked an idea in my head about fetal viability (#2 in the post):
This raises an interesting question about keeping a potentially viable baby alive.
And while I can’t find the link to the exact story, one of the stories over the last few months was about pro life protesters getting sentenced for the heinous act of… praying outside an abortion mill. The one detail in the post that caught my eye was that the patient going into the abortion mill was having contractions.
WAIT! WTF?!? The woman was having contractions, as in, about to give birth! And she needed to have the baby aborted?!? And then it struck me, and it was so danged simple it completely flew under my radar:
With all of the improvements in healthcare, why does a viable baby who can survive need to be killed? Even if a woman doesn’t want to give conventional birth, what about a c-section? While it’s been a while, years back I did some research trying to find out what the cost of adoption is. I didn’t get a definitive answer, but landed with it costing around $80,000. (Copulate) me if I’m wrong, but this sounds like a case of demand vastly outstripping supply.
Maybe if we put as much effort into birthing our next generation as we do into destroying it maybe it wouldn’t be necessary to try to import millions to replace it?
But whether or not a woman wants to be a mother to her unborn child, the far more important question to ask is why the baby needs to be killed.
Brother Bob is no longer on Facebook (although you can see his archives there), and is back on Twitter again, but is ramping up on Minds and Gab, and has his biggest presence on MeWe.
Cross posted from Brother Bob’s Blog
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Brother Bob
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, http://www.floppingaces.net and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.