In terms of Canada’s latest woke incarnation, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion(DEI) exists as a “win-win” situation. A key reason for it is found in media’s approach to its institutionalization within Canadian society.
For example, when Canada’s government-funded woke warriors moan and complain about “under-representation” of so-called “minority” communities within universities and educational institutions. When a “shortage of representation” exists, media make sure that it’s well-communicated to Canadians.
Turn-the-tables toward successes in this capacity, and the press turn stone-cold silent. Take as an example, this weeks declaration of victory in the nail-biter that was the recent provincial election in British Columbia, Canada.
It is the opinion of Cultural Action Party [est. 2016] that, despite heavy competition, the B.C. Conservative Party had no chance of winning the 2024 provincial election.
As in, zero chance. No matter how the ballots are accounted for, there was no way in hell that a party utilizing the word “Conservative” was going to emerge victorious. A superficial conclusion, to be certain. Yet, the prediction has come through with flying rainbow colours.
A deep-dive into ethnic representation in the Metro Vancouver Area speaks to the assessment. In truth, it’s a giant victory for the DEI brigade. To which we add the following fact: not a single media outlet in British Columbia(nor anywhere else) has focused on this election in terms “identifiable community” success.
There are 93 provincial electoral districts in British Columbia, which came into effect for the 2024 general election. Metro Vancouver includes 45 ridings. In terms of ethnic candidate victory, 19 winners are drawn from racialized communities.
That’s a whopping 42% of victories. Getting more granular reveals some juicy election intricacies. Relevant to this are demographic statistics eschewed by mainstream media.
For example, Richmond B.C. This Vancouver suburb is a white-minority riding. A 2021 census informs us that Chinese-Canadian headcount in Richmond is 99,780. “English” Canadians come in at a total of 12,185 residents.
In 2021, immigrants made up 45% of the population of Surrey, Metro Vancouver’s largest suburban community. The number of new immigrants almost doubled between 2016 and 2021. Surrey is a rapidly-growing community, one in which whites will transition to minority community status in less than a decade.
Which fits with the overall demography rather nicely. According to a media article published back in October, 2017, “the white population of Metro Vancouver is actually 48.6 per cent, a minority.”
It’s the last we’ve heard of that one. Imagine the number in October 2024, seven years on from this revelation. Why would media choose to sublimate this information? Should this data be considered irrelevant in terms of the future of our country?
So…Vancouver is a minority white. Richmond is minority white; Surrey will soon join them. If the press were to come clean, they would have stated long ago that a straight line exists between ethnic demography and political success. Instead, they say nothing.
Typifying ethnic political success is the riding of Surrey-Centre. To be blunt about it, racialized Canada had it in the bag the entire time. Two candidates were the only serious contenders. For the NDP, Muslim-Canadian Amna Shah. For the Conservatives, Muslim-Canadian challenger Zeeshan Wahla.
According to the 2021 census, the Muslim population in Surrey, British Columbia was 38,138, making up a mere 5.5% of the city’s population. What are serious students of politics to conclude?
One idea is that politics is a pure money game, and that nomination processes reflect this in full. The most politically ambitious and their money win at the political gambling table. If it emanates from a community that comprise 5% of the population, so be it. How else can it come to be that a small minority community can come to dominate a provincial riding in the manner that occured in Surrey-Centre?
Still, the far-way winner in this capacity belongs to Sikh-Canadian political representation:
Raj Chouhan, Reah Arora, Ravi Kahlon, Harman Bhangu, Jody Toor, Jagrup Brar, Jessie Sumner, Mandeep Dhaliwal, Niki Sharma, Sunita Dhir, Ravi Parmar, Harwinder Sandhu.
As of 2021, the Sikh population in Metro Vancouver is 222,165, forming 8.5% of the total regional population.
Talk about “diversity” winning the day. Or, don’t talk about it at all —the current methodology advanced by Canadian media. We draw a conclusion: in cases of so-called “under-representation,” the DEI pushers and their media disciples bloody murder. Conversely, in a situation that results in a giant victory for “racialized” Canada, media remain silent as the lambs.
As we said, a “win-win” situation. Let us now look at the flipside. On the losing end, we have Anglophone Canadians, “Old Stock” Canadians, white Canadians– who cannot catch a break no matter how our controlling institutions slice the political pie.
“New Canadian census data reveals the term visible minority has become virtually meaningless across Metro Vancouver, where whites have become the minority by a slight degree.”
“The region’s five largest municipalities now have significantly fewer whites than people of colour, which means Caucasians are a “visible minority” in Richmond, Surrey, Burnaby, Coquitlam and the city of Vancouver.”
Those who take the time to sleuth out these dynamics may come to understand exactly where our country is headed. In the meantime, our down-in-the-mouth “old school” communities are in the process of being rendered powerless.
Concerned citizens understand what transpires for those of us who dare to speak out– accusations of racism, a branding of “white privilege,” being tagged as “colonialists” and the rest of the systemic woke assault on our communities.
What to expect for the future? More, more, more– that’s what. Even if victorious, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre would have to trans-mutate to messiah-like status to reverse the globalist onslaught in “no core identity” Canada.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Brad Salzberg
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://bradsalzberg.substack.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.