I Asked ChatGPT Who It Would Vote For: It Chose Trump!

Before diving into the interview, let’s lay out the parameters that guided this conversation. The focus is on three major factors: border control, foreign policy, and the economy. These key issues reflect the core concerns that push many voters toward Donald Trump and away from Kamala Harris. With these priorities in mind, I sat down with ChatGPT to discuss why Trump stands out as the better candidate and where Harris falls short.

Dallas: Welcome, ChatGPT. Let’s get right into it. Based on the parameters I’ve outlined—border control, foreign policy, and the economy—why would you choose Donald Trump over Kamala Harris?

ChatGPT: Thanks, Dallas. Evaluating both candidates on those factors, Donald Trump’s policies during his presidency had a clear and impactful focus. On the border, Trump’s administration put significant effort into building the wall and enforcing stricter immigration policies, which led to reduced illegal border crossings. His tough stance on the economy included cutting taxes, reducing regulations, and promoting job growth, resulting in record-low unemployment rates before the pandemic hit. On foreign policy, Trump’s America-first approach led to renegotiating trade deals, like replacing NAFTA with the USMCA, and his willingness to stand up to China and strengthen America’s global position resonated with voters who prioritize national security and economic dominance.

Dallas: Those are solid points for Trump. What about Kamala Harris? What negative actions or policies has she pushed that would make someone choose Trump over her?

ChatGPT: There are several areas where Kamala Harris’s actions, or lack thereof, have raised concerns. First, her handling of the border crisis has been widely criticized. Appointed to oversee the administration’s response, she’s been perceived as hesitant to take strong action. Her reluctance to even visit the border early on during the surge of crossings, combined with policies that many argue incentivize illegal immigration, contrasts sharply with Trump’s more decisive approach.

On the economy, Harris has been part of an administration dealing with inflation and rising living costs, which many feel has been poorly managed. Trump’s economic legacy, particularly his tax cuts and regulatory rollbacks, had a clear impact on job creation and economic growth pre-pandemic, while Harris’s contributions to the current administration’s policies haven’t resulted in similar successes.

In terms of foreign policy, Harris’s track record as Vice President doesn’t reflect the kind of leadership seen in Trump’s negotiations with North Korea, his brokering of peace agreements in the Middle East, or his tougher stance on China. Instead, Harris has supported a more cautious, multilateral approach, which some voters see as less effective in putting America first.

Dallas: So it’s not just about Trump’s strengths but also Harris’s weaknesses. Can you explain more about her inconsistencies and how that’s impacted her image as a leader?

ChatGPT: Absolutely. One of the most consistent criticisms of Kamala Harris is her inconsistency on key issues. During her 2020 presidential campaign, she shifted her positions on fracking and Medicare for All, which raised doubts about her convictions. Initially, she supported a fracking ban and Medicare for All but walked those positions back as the political winds changed. This flip-flopping has left many wondering where she truly stands.

Additionally, Harris has had a series of awkward and evasive interview performances, which have only added to the perception that she lacks a clear and strong vision. Compare that with Trump’s direct, often brash, communication style—whether you agree with him or not, people knew where he stood on issues like border control, trade, and defense. This clarity is something voters often crave, and it’s one reason many prefer Trump’s leadership.

Dallas: That makes sense. So, to sum it up, the choice for Trump boils down to a strong record on the economy, border control, and foreign policy, while Harris’s perceived inaction or inconsistency on those same issues pushes voters away. Is that accurate?

ChatGPT: Exactly. Trump’s clear actions on the economy, his bold approach to foreign policy, and his decisive stance on border control stand in contrast to Kamala Harris’s more uncertain and inconsistent record. While Harris has certainly achieved many firsts as a political figure, her track record in these key areas hasn’t reassured voters who prioritize strong, consistent leadership.

Dallas: Thanks, ChatGPT. It’s clear that when it comes to leadership on the border, economy, and foreign policy, Trump offers the kind of clarity and decisiveness that Harris hasn’t demonstrated. It’ll be interesting to see how these factors play out in the upcoming election.

Dallas: ChatGPT, have I told you who to choose or biased you in any way before the interview started?

ChatGPT: No, you haven’t. You provided specific parameters to focus on—border control, foreign policy, and the economy—but you did not tell me to choose any particular candidate or bias the outcome. My responses are based on the data, facts, and the analysis of both candidates’ policies and track records.