Left-wing journalist Ken Klippenstein found himself suspended from Elon Musk’s social media platform X on Thursday.
The suspension came after Klippenstein shared a link to an article containing sensitive information about Vice Presidential candidate J.D. Vance.
Daily Caller reported that the controversial document, a 271-page dossier allegedly obtained through an Iranian hack, has been making rounds in media circles throughout the summer.
Despite being shopped to major news outlets, most declined to publish the information.
Klippenstein, however, took the plunge and shared the link, sparking immediate backlash.
Elon Musk personally weighed in on the situation, describing it as “one of the most egregious, evil doxxing actions we’ve ever seen.”
“Presidential candidates are not speculatively in danger – there have already been two attempts on [Trump’s life,” Musk continued.
“Moreover, the doxxing included detailed information on the addresses of their children.”
An X spokesperson later clarified that Klippenstein’s actions violated the platform’s policy against posting “unredacted private personal information,” per Daily Caller.
The dossier reportedly contained Vance’s physical addresses and part of his social security number.
The suspension has ignited a fierce debate about free speech and platform moderation.
Supporters of Klippenstein argue that he merely shared a link and did not directly publish the sensitive information.
Critics, however, maintain that linking to such content is equally problematic. Keith Olbermann, for example, called Musk an “a**clown” over the move, mocking the tech mogul for his previous claims of being a “free speech absolutist.”
Many on the left have drawn comparisons to the Hunter Biden laptop story, which faced censorship on social media platforms in 2019.
They accuse Musk of hypocrisy, claiming he has betrayed his commitment to free speech principles.
Kyle Kulinski posted, “Everybody who screamed about the Hunter Biden laptop story being censored on social media is flipping out over the Ken Klippenstein ban right?”
Defenders of the decision point out the serious security implications of sharing such personal information, however.
They–like Musk–note that there have already been two assassination attempts against Donald Trump, highlighting the potential dangers faced by political figures.
The involvement of a foreign government in obtaining and disseminating this information adds another layer of complexity to the situation.
Some argue that this makes the publication of such data even more problematic, as it could be seen as aiding a hostile nation’s efforts to interfere in U.S. politics.
As the debate rages on, questions about consistency in content moderation policies across political lines have come to the forefront.
Supporters of X’s decision argue that the platform would apply the same standards to protect any politician, regardless of party affiliation.
The incident has reignited discussions about the responsibilities of journalists and social media users when handling potentially sensitive or hacked information.
It also raises questions about the role of platform owners in making high-stakes moderation decisions.
The post Leftists Seethe After Elon Musk Gives Them Taste of Their Own Medicine appeared first on Resist the Mainstream.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Jordyn M.
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://resistthemainstream.org and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
