IMMIGRATION INTO BRITAIN – Despotism – Dystopia – BBC Crisis – Nuke Update – Wind Farms – Samson Option – Inflation – Poison ‘Food’ – ‘Nudging’ – Deep State – Letter from Great Britain – [09-28-24]

The US dollar created the Satanic (Western) Global Financial System, and idols who love it. Use it prudently but do not worship the image of the beast! Put your faith in Jesus Christ

The story begins with the Nationality Act of 1948. Prior to the Act, the concept of a ‘British Citizen’ did not quite exist. Britons, like Indians, Jamaicans, or Hongkongers were subjects of the Crown to which they owed allegiance.  After the Second World War, however, Britain was faced with the preordained break-up of its Empire, and changing relations with its component parts and with the Commonwealth.The

1948 Act was in part a response to this, and put those born in the British Dominions and Commonwealth on equal footing to native Britons. Although the previous shared status of ‘British Subject’ had in theory similar qualities, the Nationality Act meant that even with the new form of national citizenship, somebody from Kingston, Jamaica could live and work in Britain as freely as somebody from Kingston-upon-Thames.

Britain’s politicians and civil servants grossly underestimated the number who would use this opportunity. The Cabinet Papers in the National Archives show that what started as a trickle turned into a flood. For the five years after the Act passed, “Immigration from the colonies remained at no more than 2,000 per year.

This increased in 1954 and had reached over 135,000 by 1961. By the late 60s, there were well over a million non-whites in Britain, up from only a handful after the war. Most had alien cultures, and often religions, too. This posed a unique problem for England, where the majority of the newcomers settled. As Benjamin Schwarz showed in his superbly written essay, ‘Unmaking England’, Britain’s ethnic composition had remained almost unchanged for nearly a millennium-and-a-half, or, it might be argued, much longer than that.

Genetic records show that the matrilineal ancestors of some three quarters of white Britons were already in the British Isles some 6,000 years ago. “The tiny number of Roman and Norman conquerors were the thinnest veneer over the native population,” argues Mr. Schwarz, “and have left virtually no genetic trace.” Angles, Saxons, Frisians and similar (which brought no more than 250,000) essentially completed the mix.  As the dean of British geneticists, Oxford’s Sir Walter Bodmer, explains, the country’s genetic history reveals ‘the extraordinary stability of the British population. Britain hasn’t changed much since 600 AD.” 

To be clear, this is not to make an argument for blood and soil nationalism. It does, however, give the lie to the shibboleth that we have “always been a nation of immigrants.”

In fact, it would be difficult to identify a nation to which this statement would be less aptly applied: what makes England, and Britain, unique is its ethnic stability.

For instance, Benjamin Schwarz points out that in the 1960s, Iona and Peter Opie showed that English children had played many of the same games since the 1100s. Robert Tombs, a professor of history at Cambridge, suggests that: “If a nation is a group of people with a sense of kinship, a political identity and representative institutions, then the English have a fair claim to be the oldest nation in the world.”

This singular permanence allowed England to develop and “evolve in itself and to adopt foreign cultural influences wholly on its own terms”, Schwarz contends (pointing out that even William the Conqueror was accepted as Sovereign because he vowed to uphold English Law). This Law, of course, is the Common Law, the immeasurable advantages of which are well rehearsed; however, it is difficult to imagine such a system – or even a community in which societal trust extends as far beyond extended family as it does in Britain – emerging and surviving in a country that had not remained so stable for so long.

Ironically, Britain’s stability had previously also made it uniquely tolerant of eccentricity and thus highly effective at integrating foreigners (to the extent their children were entirely anglicised: think Holst, Handel, Disraeli, Conrad, Churchill, Elliot, et al.) The problem posed by the immigration of the 1950s and 60s, therefore, was its scale and speed, which inevitably led to the formation of ethnic immigrant enclaves, making integration impossible.

In the second half of the 1960s, two of Britain’s greatest politicians offered competing solutions to this predicament.  Roy Jenkins was perhaps the most consequential British politician never to have been Prime Minister. An elitist and a liberal, Mr (later Lord) Jenkins was highly intelligent, an assiduous worker, a greatly esteemed biographer and a man of letters.

He was one of the most important intellectual forces behind much of Britain’s liberal shift since the 1960s. Mr Jenkins argued in a 1966 speech that the country should not become a ‘melting pot’, turning out everybody in a common mould. Instead, immigrants could keep “their own national characteristics and culture”. Thus, integration would not mean flattening assimilation, but “equal opportunity accompanied by cultural diversity”.

This, then, is the core of multiculturalism. Today, the term is commonly misunderstood as ‘different races living alongside each other’. Instead, per Jenkins, it was the idea of many cultures living in parallel and tolerance.

Enoch Powell disagreed. An ambitious and curiously intense man, Powell was perhaps the finest intellect to serve in Parliament since the war. He knew 13 languages, was then the second youngest man to make professor (after Frederick Nietzsche), and had during the war been promoted from Private to Brigadier.

Crucially, he had fallen in love with India during the years he had spent there, and had been horrified by the inter-ethnic violence he saw. He had also travelled to the USA in 1967, where he had seen first-hand the bloody conflict between African-Americans and the Detroit police. He believed that the multiculturalism that was de fecto emerging in Britain would inevitably lead to the same outcome. He therefore favoured ending immigration and a programme of voluntary repatriation.

In April 1968, Powell gave a speech in Birmingham to set out his case. What became known as the ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech was one of the most notorious speeches in British political history. Powell’s prose was peppered with incendiary language, including racial pejoratives.

Edward Heath, the Leader of the Opposition, was appalled by the speech, as were the rest of the Shadow Cabinet, and Powell was dismissed the next day, never to return to front bench politics. Indeed, the speech was so inflammatory that advocating for reduced immigration became difficult in polite society for two generations.

Yet, that same year, perhaps startled by the fact that 74% of Britons polled at the time supported Powell’s recommendations, the government pushed through the Commonwealth Immigrants Act to curtail migration. In 1971. The Immigration Act did likewise. In 1981 the British Nationality Act tightened control yet further. The cumulative effect was to keep net migration low until the 1990s.

In 1997, Tony Blair’s ‘New’ Labour was elected. It immediately set out to raise immigration levels in a deliberate effort to make Britain truly multicultural; to make Jenkins’s vision of a diverse Britain real. In 1997, New Labour removed the Primary Purpose Rule, which required those marrying foreigners to prove they had not wed to secure British residency.  https://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/12/tony_blair_on_multiculturalism_and_integration.html

In 1998, it removed border exit checks to all destinations, making it impossible to know who was in the country and who had overstayed their visa. In 1999, it expanded student permits. In 2000, it relaxed work requirements. In 2004, it expanded post-study work visas. All of these steps (sometimes taken without Parliamentary oversight) led to significant increases in immigration.

Added to this, immigration from the EU increased dramatically. In 2004, the EU expanded with the accession of the so-called A10 countries: Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Given eight of these countries had recently been members of the much poorer Soviet Bloc, many existing EU members harboured concerns that sudden access to the EU’s freedom of movement rights would lead to a surge in migration.

The Netherlands, France, Germany, Austria, Spain, Portugal, Belgium and Luxembourg thus placed restrictions on migrant workers from the ‘A8’ countries, including quotas for two-to-five year transition periods. Not Britain. The Home Office estimated that only 5,000-13,000 immigrants a year would arrive from the A8 members, and it therefore saw no need to apply restrictions. In reality, average immigration from the A8 nations into Britain was 72,000 per year, eight times more than the middle of the Home Office’s forecast range.

The same thing happened with the accession of Romania and Bulgaria in 2014: by 2017, there were 413,000 Romanians and Bulgarians living in Britain, implying that some 90,000 had immigrated every year since the beginning of 2014 – three-and-a-half times the government’s estimate.

New Labour’s policies thus led to monumental increase in migration.  In 2016, Britain voted to leave the EU, in part because freedom of movement within the Single Market made controlling migration near impossible. Yet while Conservative governments have ended free movement, they have increased overall immigration.

In 2022, Britain handed out a record 1.1 million visas for foreigners to work or live in the Britain.  Jonathan Portes, an LSE academic in favour of high immigration, wrote in the Guardian that EU migration had “largely or wholly been replaced by non-EU migration”.  Migration policy since 1949 increased the proportion of Britons who were non-white from 0.1% in 1951 to nearly 25% in 2021. Rightly or wrongly, this process has been beyond unpopular.  Sources

• The Real Story of Immigration Into Britain.    https://dailysceptic.org/2024/08/14/the-real-story-of-immigration-into-britain/
• IN EPISODE 11 OF THE SCEPTIC: Freddie Attenborough, on Starmer’s Social Media Crackdown, Andy Collingwood on the Truth About Immigration and C.J. Strachan on Anti-White Hiring in the Police. https://dailysceptic.org/2024/08/29/in-episode-11-of-the-sceptic-freddie-attenborough-on-starmers-social-media-crackdown-andy-collingwood-on-the-truth-about-immigration-and-c-j-strachan-on-anti-white-hiring-in-the-police/

BRITAIN IS BARRELLING TOWARDS TOTALITARIANISM.

Instead, because the public’s fury is directed toward one of globalism’s sacred cows (mass migration) angry parents have been condemned for fomenting “violent riots.” Protecting children from serial killers and sexual predators, it seems, is not “politically correct.” Of course, anyone familiar with the Rotherham grooming scandal already knew that.

The problem, according to the ruling Establishment Blob is not that open border immigration policies have led to marked increases in violent crime and cultural hostility, but rather that ordinary citizens have begun to express their displeasure. Commie Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced a two-pronged solution for combating public dissent:

• increased social media censorship and
• widespread implementation of facial recognition technology to beef up Britain’s already robust mass surveillance police state. This is raw tyranny following ‘Big Brother’s’ favorite playbook:  First, the government creates a problem that harms ordinary citizen.  Next, authorities pretend that no problem actually exists.  Eventually, citizens are forced to take matters into their own hands.  Finally, the government uses public outrage as an excuse to expand its own powers.  Source
• Brits are pushing back against the government’s criminal enterprise; our Marxist prime minister has chosen to use the crisis as a pretext for increasing mass surveillance and banning free speech.  https://www.truth11.com/untitled-1625/?ref=truth11-com-newsletter

THE GENESIS OF TODAY’S DYSTOPIA

A nation of 55 million in 2000 is today over 65 million, with almost all of that growth coming from immigration, a majority from non-EU nations, particularly from the Middle East and Africa, countries that don’t share British culture or, importantly, religion. (It’s also likely that many of the ostensibly EU immigrants originated in non-EU countries.)

As a consequence, London, home to 20% of England’s population, has gone from approximately 80% native white British in 1991 to approximately 36% in 2021. The native population has surely shrunk more since then.

The result of this transformation of Britain from a largely British nation to something else has been monstrous. Possibly the single most despicable example is the 20-plus-year Rotherham child rape scandal that saw hundreds of Pakistani Muslims rape over a thousand British girls right under the noses of police who did nothing for fear of being called racists.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, those who dared report on the various trials, viz, here and here, found themselves jailed for doing so.  At the same time, London has become a killing ground for knife attacks, the overwhelming number being committed by minorities. Indeed, the country has become beset with machete attacks, a crime that was historically unheard of in Britain but which is common in the third world.  Source

• Britain, Which Birthed American Ideas About Liberty, Has Embraced Despotism  https://www.truth11.com/untitled-1633/?ref=truth11-com-newsletter

STOP PRESS – Hundreds of Thousands Are Ditching the Licence Fee – and it’s a Crisis for the BBC

“Tim Davie, the BBC Director General, was candid this week about the scale of the financial challenges facing the public service broadcaster.  Speaking ahead of the publication of the BBC’s annual report on Tuesday, Davie said: “We have been working extremely hard to get a budget that balances. The market for content is inflating rapidly … We’ve got all kinds of cost pressures.”

Those pressures were evident in the BBC’s latest financial results, which showed an £80 million fall in licence fee revenues, the broadcaster’s main income, to £3.7bn.

This was driven in part by a Government-imposed freeze on the licence fee. More worryingly for the BBC the number of households paying the levy dropped by half a million to 23.9 million; an acceleration from the previous year’s decline.

For executives in W1A, the exodus of paying viewers is nothing short of an existential crisis.  The decline has been fuelled by calls for a boycott of the licence fee, with campaign groups such as the Taxpayers’ Alliance branding the household levy “archaic and unfair”.

Another campaign, calling itself ‘Defund the BBC’, has raised concerns about wasteful spending and alleged bias in the broadcaster’s output, as well as its aggressive prosecution of licence fee non-payment, which disproportionately affects women and poorer people.

Patrick Barwise, author of The War Against the BBC, compares the increase in licence fee dodgers to the epidemic of middle-class shoplifting. “This is people free-riding on the basis that they think they can get away with it,” he says.

Yet there is a more fundamental shift that the corporation must contend with. Audiences, especially younger ones, increasingly feel they can do without the BBC’s output.

The BBC is used by 69% of Britons under 16 each week. That’s down from 72% the previous year and puts the broadcaster behind YouTube and Netflix. The declines for children under seven are even more acute.

Even ‘BBC Sounds’, a cornerstone of the corporation’s efforts to reach younger audiences, is struggling to gain traction. The number of 16 to 34 year-olds using the streaming service slipped to 585,000 last year, behind a target of at least 600,000.  Instead, younger viewers are turning to video-sharing platforms such as YouTube and TikTok. The BBC’s research found more under-35s watched global streaming services on average per week than Britain’s broadcasters.

NEWS FLASH

While not stating that this would automatically greenlight the ability of Russia to respond with nuclear weapons, he did assert that the threshold for their use would be met based on “reliable information about a massive launch of aerospace attack means and their crossing of our State border.”

Putin very clearly lowered the threshold regarding Russian strategic forces use of nukes whilst the West, especially the US and Britain consider whether to allow Ukraine to attack Russian territory using NATO-provided long-range missiles. Source

• President Vladimir Putin issued this hugely significant statement regarding his country’s nuclear doctrine (via ZeroHedge)  https://www.theburningplatform.com/2024/09/25/putin-lowers-threshold-of-nuclear-weapons-use-in-dramatic-warning-aimed-at-nato/

FUN TIDBIT

THOUGHT FOR THE WEEK – Are taxpayers bearing the price for Great British Energy?

• Speaking at the launch of the new state-run Great British Energy, Sir Keir unveiled a partnership between the company and the Crown Estate to speed up the construction of offshore wind projects  https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2024/07/25/paying-the-price-for-great-british-energy/

BREAKING NEWS:  Don’t forget to follow this link at UK Column which is a truly independent, multimedia, and real-news website: supported by its members

DESPATCHES FROM THE FRONTLINE – THE SAMSON OPTION – WHY ISRAEL IS THE GREATEST THREAT TO THE ENTIRE WORLD

• The Apartheid State Of Israel Is Now Unsustainable.   https://www.theburningplatform.com/2024/06/23/prophets-predict-the-end-of-zionism-because/
• According to AG Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Times: “Journalists hold power to account by exposing corruption and abuse. Journalists reveal injustice and inequality”. Nowhere has this myth been more thoroughly exposed than in news coverage of the war crimes that have been committed in Gaza since 10/7.
• Critics have identified how Palestinians have been consistently dehumanised and marginalised in the media and highlighted the fact that established news outlets have firmly reproduced a consensus on Israel’s unambiguous right to “self-defence”.
• History has been erased, genocide normalised and language brutalised when describing massacres as “precision air strikes”.
• The issue of how the British military has contributed to Israel’s assault on Gaza, other than those stories on active military operations against the Houthis and Iranian drones, there have been very few pieces in the MSM exploring the underbelly of British military relations with Israel https://www.declassifieduk.org/how-mainstream-media-ignores-uk-military-support-for-israel/

INFLATION MONITOR –  CPI Inflation remained unchanged last month, above Britain’s official target.  The consumer prices index, which tracks cost changes across the economy, rose by 2.2% in the year to August, data released by the Office for National Statistics shows. That means prices are rising a little faster than the Bank of England’s target of 2%.  On a monthly basis, inflation rose by 0.3% in August 2024, the same rate as a year earlier.

The core CPI, which excludes energy, food, alcohol and tobacco, rose by 3.6% in the 12 months to August 2024, up from 3.3% in July:

Services Inflation was even worse and Britain is an economy of 70% services.

SURVIVAL MONITOR –  Processed Food | Fibrous Matter Filled With Poisons.  Your Health is Crucial for Survival – Protect It Now especially if you have been Vaxxed!

The USDA was created to ensure a wholesome food supply. Unfortunately, the USDA has been captured by big agricultural interests.  They’re doing the opposite of what’s supposed to be done; they’re making war on the small farmer and on public health.

It is required to eat eight carrots today to get the same nutritional value that one carrot would give a generation ago. And that carrot is loaded with chemicals: aldrin, neonicotinoid pesticides, glyphosate, and an entire universe of forever chemicals, none of which have been adequately tested for safety.  Source

• The assumption is that all chemicals are good for you unless proven guilty. It’s up to the industry to finance the tests, so of course, those tests never get done. We’ve got all these chemicals that should not be in food  https://www.truth11.com/american-food-fibrous-matter-filled-with-poisons/?ref=truth11-com-newsletter

NARRATIVE BATTLE – How HMG Psychological Manipulation of the Public Became Normal

Britain, a purported beacon of freedom and democracy, has descended into a dystopian police state ruled by an amoral, greedy banker class supported by a global cabal ensconced in Switzerland, a legacy from WW2 Nazis, 95% of whom escaped Nuremburg.  Look no further than the history of Klaus Schwab and his father and family. Sources

• The research sought to reveal the actors responsible for strategically frightening and shaming the British people during Covid. Focusing on the controversial ‘Look them in the eyes’ messaging campaign https://dailysceptic.org/2024/06/26/how-government-psychological-manipulation-of-the-public-became-normal/
• British Intel’s ‘Counter-Disinfo’ War Goes Global

Global Delinquents – British Intel’s Censorship War Goes Global https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/british-intels-counter-disinfo-war?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

THE GOVERNMENT (HMG) IS NOT YOUR FRIEND. NOR DOES IT WORK FOR “WE THE BRITISH PEOPLE.” [Extracts from an original article by John and Nisha Whitehead | The Rutherford Institute | Rutherford.org – Anglicised for Britain (the parallels are remarkable]

Only this time, the people were totally unaware of how they were being ruled by foreign tyrants. These elites suffocated, drained and oppressed the colony, and enriched themselves in astronomical ways by imposing taxes on literally everything. This kept the American people in perpetual poverty, while multiplying the wealth of their wicked rulers. It was a brilliant and extremely diabolical scheme to enslave both America and the world.

By gradually whittling away at freedom and free speech, free assembly, due process, and privacy, HMG liberated itself from its contractual agreement to respect constitutional rights while resetting the calendar back to a time when there was no Bill of Rights to challenge the long arm of big government.

Tories and Labour like to act as if there’s a huge difference between them and their policies. However, they are not sworn enemies so much as they are partners in crime, united in a common goal, which is to maintain the status quo.  General Elections merely serve to maintain the status quo. Once elected Prime Minister, that person becomes part of the dictatorial continuum that is the The Establishment Blob in Westminter.

HMG is spending money it doesn’t have on programs it can’t afford, all the while the national debt continues to grow, domestic infrastructure continues to deteriorate, and our borders continue to be breached. What is going on?  It’s obvious that a corporatised, militarised, entrenched global bureaucracy is ruling Britain.

George Orwell’s 1984 has become a standard operation manual for the omnipresent, modern-day, surveillance biosecurity state.  When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, The People are being ruled by criminals. In the current governmental climate, obeying one’s conscience (Tony Benn quotes) and speaking truth to the power of the Police State can easily render you an “enemy of the state.”

If voting made any difference, they wouldn’t allow it.  Britons only think they’re choosing the next government. In truth, however, they’re engaging in the illusion of participation culminating in the reassurance ritual of voting. It’s just another manufactured illusion conjured up to keep the populace compliant and convinced that their vote counts and that they still have some influence over the political process, which clearly they don’t.

More than terrorism, more than domestic extremism, more than gun violence and organised crime, HMG has become a greater menace to the life, liberty, and property of its citizens than any of the so-called dangers from which the government claims to protect against.

HMG knows exactly which buttons to push in order to manipulate the populace and gain the public’s cooperation and compliance (viz 2020). This draconian exercise in how to divide, conquer and subdue a nation succeeds every time. It demonstrates how to use the politics of fear to persuade a freedom-endowed people to shackle themselves to a tyrannical dictatorship.

HMG long ago sold out to the Banksters’ highest bidder. Every Briton is now guilty until proven innocent.  “We The People” are no longer shielded by the rule of law.  While Magna Carta gave The People a voice, it’s been muzzled.  Common Law, which protects against being bullied, badgered, beaten, broken, and spied on by government agents has been disemboweled.  Privacy, as we have known it, is dead. Every second of every day, the British people are being spied on by HMG’s vast network of digital Peeping Toms, electronic eavesdroppers and robotic snoops (aka GCHQ, MI5, SIS et al).

Private property means nothing if HMG can take your home, car or money under the flimsiest of pretexts, whether it be compulsory purchase schemes, eminent domain or overdue property taxes.  If there is an absolute maxim by which HMG seems to operate, it is that the British taxpayer will always get cheated by force.

From the moment they are born to the time they legally come of age, young people are now wards of the state.  All it needs in order to be flagged as a suspicious character, labelled an enemy of the state, and locked up like a dangerous criminal is to use certain trigger words, surf the internet, communicate using a cell phone, drive a car, stay at a hotel, take flying lessons, appear suspicious, question government authority, or generally live  ‘normally’ in Britain.

Our freedoms continue to be erroded by a prevailing view among government bureaucrats that they have the right to search, seize, strip, scan, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time and for the slightest provocation all in the name of ‘national security’.

Clearly, measured by their actions, the Establishment fear The People so much they must continually tighten the screw to avoid a mass revolt, along the lines of our 1642 Civil War. (The ruling class know their history!)

These are not issues that can be glibly dismissed with a few well-chosen words, as do most politicians.  I published an analysis on the devious machinations of Britain’s political process last year: https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/smart-cities-online-safety-bill-birmingham?sd=pf

COMING NEXT:

• BOOM’s Weekly Global Review – Tuesday, October 1, 2024
• The Financial Jigsaw, Part 2 (30) – THE WAR ON TERROR – Saturday, October 5, 2024

REFERENCE – My Books: “The Financial Jigsaw” Parts 1 & 2 Scroll:   https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358117070_THE_FINANCIAL_JIGSAW_-_PART_1_-_4th_Edition_2020   including regular updates.