WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s protracted battle to avoid extradition to the United States is reaching a climactic moment as his legal avenues narrow. Assange’s lawyers argue that sending him to the U.S. to face trial over WikiLeaks’ publication of classified documents would have grave consequences for press freedoms worldwide.
The U.K. Supreme Court’s refusal to allow an appeal in Assange’s case has signaled a possible conclusion to his decade-long legal struggle. In the U.S., Assange is accused of espionage over WikiLeaks’ 2010-2011 release of classified American military and diplomatic cables. His supporters see him as an anti-establishment hero who has been victimized because he exposed U.S. wrongdoing in conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. His detractors, including U.S. and U.K. government officials, dismiss him as a criminal whose actions endangered lives.
Assange had been sheltered at the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012 after he breached bail. His asylum there was revoked in April 2019, leading to his arrest by British police. Since then, he has been held at London’s high-security Belmarsh Prison, awaiting the outcome of extradition proceedings.
Stella Moris, Assange’s partner, emphasizes the severity of his situation, describing it as a “fight of his life,” given that in the U.S., he could face a potential prison sentence of up to 175 years if found guilty. The case hinges on whether his actions qualify as espionage or as the work of a journalist. While the U.S. seeks to make an example of Assange, his case presents fundamental questions about journalistic freedoms and the public’s right to know.
The legal wrangling has had significant personal consequences for Assange, who has two young children with Moris. She stresses the toll that the long legal battle has taken on Assange’s health and the strain it places on their family.
If Assange’s last bid to prevent extradition fails, his advocates have vowed to continue the fight, suggesting that his case will continue to fuel a broader debate on freedom of speech and the balance between national security and the public’s right to information. The coming weeks may be definitive for Assange, with the potential for major implications not just for him, but for journalism and international norms surrounding transparency and freedom of the press.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Faith N
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.offthepress.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.