This site has raised some suspicions about Mr. Brand. Mostly because if YouTube allows someone to be on its platform that is counter-narrative and influential, then there is a reason its allowed and that is usually as effective agents of disinformation of one kind or another. I reference personal experience with YouTube, where numerous channels have been shut down over the years, one of which had over 20M views and a crazy high number of subscribers. The channel was shut down even though the exact same videos existed on many other channels. We just subtitled them into English, allowing a MUCH broader viewer base, and a much greater awareness of the issues. At that time, and probably still, Western nations kind of geofence information. The idea being if there is an Islamic attack in a city, not much is reported outside that city. Anyway several of our channels were shut down and we didn’t even do commentary. We didn’t offer opinions. We showed proof of what was going on, and that, in a nascent communist state, is anathema.
Dr. Peter McCullough just made one video. As a world-class cardiologist he made a YouTube video with all peer reviewed data showing a link between myocarditis and Pericarditis and the mRNA shots. Bang zoom his video and channel be gone.
Russel Brand has an enormous following, is very influential, and appears to be counter narrative in an unsubtle way.
Recently, I had the opportunity to speak with a victim of what I now think of as a “me-too-attack”. He had worked with Julian Assange. Enemy #1 of the Democratic National Committee, which could easily be conflated with the COMINTERN or the shadowy group which represents the new Western World tyrannical regime. Shortly after his work with Assange, women came out of the woodwork and accused him of things which damn nearly destroyed his life. All the allegations where proven false, and he won 6 figure law suits against the women. Chances are, the people who put them up to it, paid the suit as part of the deal.
So who did put them up to it?
A source close to him admitted that this was a classic US military intel tactic. One they normally used against enemies of the US. That the method and details of the attack on him was exactly as the US military does these things. This is according to someone who actually helped create these kinds of attacks for the US military.
So now I have to rethink Russel brand.
Whatever he may have been, at some point he became the counter-narrative. If he wasn’t genuine early on, he became genuine. Appearing with Tucker Carlson and many other taboo actions by Russel meant he had to be disappeared. And they can’t just take down his channel. Too much influence. So they had to use the big guns. Destroy his credibility so just moving to Rumble wouldn’t be much of an option. He had to have his audience cleaved from him. And now I wonder if he wasn’t always genuine, but was too big for YouTube to remove him early on. I dunno. But it sure looks like the US deep state, the Democratic National Committee, the military has focussed one of their best weapons on him and are trying to take him down. We all have to decide for ourselves if we are going to let this happen to anyone who opposed the new neo-Marxist totalitarian regime, now firmly in place. They did it to Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, they do it to anyone that is a threat to the revolution. And now that I have had a long and personal talk with one of its victims, the attack stands in sharp contrast to any organic event. It makes one question so many of these people brought down by a rabid pack of allegations all at once against someone. Did Weinstein forget his monthly Democratic National Committee payment? Did Bill Cosby really fail bartending school that badly? Maybe some of these are true. But the me-too movement overall does appear to be a dialectical weapon of the left to ensure no threats to the revolution can happen. At least until they have so much control they can deal with us more simply.
This is happening pic.twitter.com/N8zIKLbJN2
— Russell Brand (@rustyrockets) September 15, 2023
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Eeyore
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://vladtepesblog.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.