Rhoda Wilson
Much has been made of the draft of the International Health Regulations released last week. Although some changes have been made and some wording moved around, the World Health Organization’s (“WHO’s”) plans are the same as they were before.
This week, from 22 and 26 April, the 8th meeting of WHO’s Working Group on the International Health Regulations (2005) (“WGIHR”) is convening. The WGIHR’s task has been to incorporate 300+ proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) (“IHR”).
Please note that there are two instruments that WHO is attempting to have ratified at the next World Health Assembly taking place from 27 May to 1 June 2024: the IHR amendments; and, the Pandemic Treaty, also referred to as the Pandemic Accord, Pandemic Agreement and WHO Convention Agreement + (“WHO CA+”). Both instruments are intended to achieve the same aim. The Globalists require only one of them to be adopted next month to achieve their aims.
Although there have been several drafts of the proposed Pandemic Treaty, there has been little official information released regarding the IHR amendments. The proposed 300+ amendments to the IHR were released in February 2023 and, a year later, an unofficial draft of the amended IHR was leaked, in February 2024.
Last week, on 17 April, the WGIHR released another draft of the proposed amended IHR labelled ‘Proposed Bureau’s text for Eighth WGIHR Meeting, 22–26 April 2024’.
With the release of this draft, it appears as if WHO has taken out some of the more controversial provisions. While some have claimed WHO is “backing down” and this is a “major victory for freedom,” they may have been too hasty.
Related: Dr. Meryl Nass: WHO’s pandemic plans are built on lies and misdirection
Dr. Meryl Nass, who has been following WHO’s negotiations and various drafts of both the IHR amendments and Pandemic Treaty closely, has said: “The current language has been watered down, and is a bit trickier to disentangle, but the plan is exactly the same.”
Referring readers to an article published on Door to Freedom comparing the latest draft of the amended IHR to the currently applicable IHR, Dr. Nass wrote on her Substack:
People said surveillance and censorship: control of misinformation and disinformation had been removed. Not so. They are just moved to an Annex and inserted elsewhere … The control of information is now even more stringent, as “surveillance” and managing misinformation are now considered “Core Capacities” that all nations will have to develop, and on which they will be scored using a monitoring system still to be developed.
So what if the term “non-binding” is no longer crossed out? The document is still binding on nations due to other language, the requirement to report back to the WHO on how well nations are complying, and the new compliance and implementation committee, which will ride herd on nations that do not comply.
Human rights, which were crossed out in the earlier draft, are now back. This shows you that those negotiating these treaties think your human rights are negotiable and can be given or taken away with the stroke of a pen.
The language stating that the WHO [Director-General] could designate potential pandemics has been replaced with likely pandemics. A weasel way of saying the same thing.
Door to Freedom team shines a light on how little has really changed in the new version of the April 2024 amended IHR, Dr. Meryl Nass, 24 April 2024
[…]
Via https://expose-news.com/2024/04/25/who-is-not-backing-down-on-its-pandemic-plans/
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: stuartbramhall
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://stuartbramhall.wordpress.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.