We have written many times about the ‘cheap trick’ statistical illusion. This is where people who suffer some bad outcome shortly after a vaccination (such as an adverse event, or infection from the disease they were supposed to be vaccinated against) are misclassified as ‘unvaccinated’. Such misclassifcation, if applied during the period of intense vaccine roll-out, will create – even for a placebo – an illusion of high efficacy for a few weeks before gradually declining. We have also provided numerous examples of covid vaccine studies whose conclusions are compromised due to such misclassification.
Now we have produced a systematic review of covid vaccine studies claiming high efficacy and/or safety and published the pre-print on ResearchGate:
In its first week the paper has had over 10,000 reads on ResearchGate.
Jonathan Engler has already writte a very good summary of the paper here, so there is no need to attempt yet another summary:
Now, while we have never had any problems putting our papers on ResearchGate, ever since we started questioning the ‘official narrative’ about covid any papers we submitted to the main preprint servers MedrXiv and ArXiv were rejected (for a range of frivolous reasons).
Out of routine – and just to be able to catalogue what we assumed would be another spurious reason to censor our work – we submitted the paper to MedrXiv. We got the same initial response we have previously got whereby, unlike almost all submissions that are within scope, they needed to do some further ‘checks’. Then, to our amazement, they published the paper.
It is noticeable that, in recent weeks, there has been an increasing trickle of more mainstream reports highlighting problems with the covid vaccinses. So, it seems that the academia and media iron-grip censorship against vaccine-critical work is now being relaxed.
24 March 2024 Update: Since the paper was published on ResearchGate and medrXiv we have fixed some minor errors (special thanks to David Paton for pointing out a few). So here is the latest version:
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Norman Fenton
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.